Studs & Duds - First quarter of the season

[Lake Shore Drive]

Studs and duds from Bears' first quarter of 2019 season

I agree with this list entirely except labeling Adam Shaheen a 'dud'. I wouldn't label him as a stud by any means, but he's at least playing better than the last two seasons. His lack of receptions is primarily due to him being low on the target list totem pole. Overall, I've been ok with his play to date. Maybe a tepid ok at that, but ok nonetheless.

 

[Jiddy]

Studs and duds from Bears' first quarter of 2019 season

I agree with this list entirely except labeling Adam Shaheen a 'dud'. I wouldn't label him as a stud by any means, but he's at least playing better than the last two seasons. His lack of receptions is primarily due to him being low on the target list totem pole. Overall, I've been ok with his play to date. Maybe a tepid ok at that, but ok nonetheless.

Our TE position as a whole is a dud...but that may be a result of the other issues on offense....I mean, there's about a million arrows you can point at problems on offense for this team.

And yet, here we are finding some sort of light in the darkness with, of all people, Chase Daniel. *shakes head* Fans are gonna run Trubisky out of town. I'm sure of it...for some second-rate player like Daniel. Deep ball accuracy *audible groan* ....Same ol' sh*t with this team.

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

Our TE position as a whole is a dud...but that may be a result of the other issues on offense....I mean, there's about a million arrows you can point at problems on offense for this team.

And yet, here we are finding some sort of light in the darkness with, of all people, Chase Daniel. *shakes head* Fans are gonna run Trubisky out of town. I'm sure of it...for some second-rate player like Daniel. Deep ball accuracy *audible groan* ....Same ol' sh*t with this team.

Neither look like the answer.

 

[Jiddy]

Neither look like the answer.

Probably right...The worst part of it? I don't like our options going into next season if we move on.

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

Probably right...The worst part of it? I don't like our options going into next season if we move on.

Think we could get Alex Smith?

 

[Jiddy]

Think we could get Alex Smith?

Is he even an option? It looked like his career was over with that injury. Hell, I forgot all about that dude.

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

Is he even an option? It looked like his career was over with that injury. Hell, I forgot all about that dude.

Alex Smith wants to play again, for the challenge of returning to football if nothing else

I wouldnt mind dumping chase and bringing in a rookie either.

 

[Jiddy]

Alex Smith wants to play again, for the challenge of returning to football if nothing else

I wouldnt mind dumping chase and bringing in a rookie either.

I mean...How the f*ck is Daniel Jones a rock star in 2 f*cking games? It's hard to argue...but if we get a rookie, that's gonna be a very late round rookie....soooo...I still hold I'm not a huge fan of our options as they currently stand. The best option is Trubisky breaks the f*ck out. But he's getting McCown lited by Daniel at the moment, so we might just be f*cked and looking at opportunity lost.

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

I mean...How the f*ck is Daniel Jones a rock star in 2 f*cking games? It's hard to argue...but if we get a rookie, that's gonna be a very late round rookie....soooo...I still hold I'm not a huge fan of our options as they currently stand. The best option is Trubisky breaks the f*ck out. But he's getting McCown lited by Daniel at the moment, so we might just be f*cked and looking at opportunity lost.

Maybe the jags like minshew so much that they trade us foles for a low pick.

 

[Jiddy]

Maybe the jags like minshew so much that they trade us foles for a low pick.

That cap hit would be huge, wouldn't it? I mean, didn't he get some obnoxious contract?

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

That cap hit would be huge, wouldn't it? I mean, didn't he get some obnoxious contract?

Not sure, just spitballing.

 

[richig07]

And yet, here we are finding some sort of light in the darkness with, of all people, Chase Daniel. *shakes head* Fans are gonna run Trubisky out of town. I'm sure of it...for some second-rate player like Daniel. Deep ball accuracy *audible groan* ....Same ol' sh*t with this team.

Go ahead and name ONE poster here who thinks that we should get rid of Trubisky for Daniel.

Do it... Name one.

 

[Jiddy]

Go ahead and name ONE poster here who thinks that we should get rid of Trubisky for Daniel.

Do it... Name one.

I'll toss you up a serve of "You, richi" you if you promise to give me a novel about the definition of semantics.

 

[Jiddy]

Go ahead and name ONE poster here who thinks that we should get rid of Trubisky for Daniel.

Do it... Name one.

Awesome Trubisky stat

I found a few. What's my prize?

Before you say it, I know...But you never did clarify "here"....so....Semantics!

 

[richig07]

Awesome Trubisky stat

I found a few. What's my prize?

Before you say it, I know...But you never did clarify "here"....so....Semantics!

You found zero posters saying that we should give up on Trubisky and make Daniel the future.

You found posters expressing great concern over Trubisky. Saying that they haven't given up on him yet, but that they are getting close. Good try.

Before you say it, I know...But you never did clarify "here"....so....Semantics!

Sorry, but I'm just not sure what this means.

 

[richig07]

I'll toss you up a serve of "You, richi" you if you promise to give me a novel about the definition of semantics.

I don't know how I could be much clearer.

I am starting to think you're just trolling. There's no way that any reasonable person could have concluded that I was suggesting we should start Daniel with a healthy Trubisky. I think I clarified that 5 or 6 times even. Unless you're just so blinded by some sort of emotion that you couldn't take in the text properly.

Semantics = Logic concerned with meaning

It's pretty obvious you were using the word without knowing what it meant in the other thread. You were using to say that BWW and myself were using "deep ball/downfield accuracy" statistics to create a semantics argument. That makes zero sense. I think you had believed that "semantics" meant "nit-picking" (which you used once) or "anecdotal".

Those words still don't shine you in a better light throughout that particular conversation... but at least it's not jibberish. At least it's English. Which is a start.

 

[richig07]

Awesome Trubisky stat

I found a few. What's my prize?

Before you say it, I know...But you never did clarify "here"....so....Semantics!

Wait...

But you never did clarify "here"....

Yes, I did. lol. Look at the post you're responding to.

 

[BearsWillWin]

Awesome Trubisky stat

I found a few. What's my prize?

Before you say it, I know...But you never did clarify "here"....so....Semantics!

The word here is literally included in his post.

You’re a failed abortion.

 

[Jiddy]

The word here is literally included in his post.

You’re a failed abortion.

Digging hard, eh, oh miserable one? Nah...you've swung and missed this time...Read closer.

 

[Jiddy]

Wait...

But you never did clarify "here"....

Yes, I did. lol. Look at the post you're responding to.

Go ahead and name ONE poster here who thinks that we should get rid of Trubisky for Daniel.

Do it... Name one.

Here, as in sportshoopla here..and the link leads to a poster HERE, on sportshoopla...It was a joke howdy...but a more then understandable one. You guys dig so f*cking hard. LOL