Wamu
whats-a-matta-u?
Not any worse then the "Big 10" having "14" teams....
I guess 'counting' is not a prerequisite for B1G schools....
They'll get to it....
Hey stop picking on the BigTen+2+2 more. Shit the Big XII can't add either!
Not any worse then the "Big 10" having "14" teams....
I guess 'counting' is not a prerequisite for B1G schools....
They'll get to it....
In all seriousness why is it the BIG 14? The PAC 10 went to the PAC 12?Hey stop picking on the BigTen+2+2 more. Shit the Big XII can't add either!
I'm guessing he will be contacting the Stanford math deptGood question. Ask Jim Harbaugh, he probably knows the answer.
At least Penn State can add....Hey stop picking on the BigTen+2+2 more. Shit the Big XII can't add either!
Should be 100%...92% of the teams will have a CCG win, pending this week, so far in the CFP. You would see that drop off bigtime with an expansion to 6 teams, even with only 5 major conferences.
Why enlist an entire committee to objectively decide the 4 best teams if you're just going to only go with conference champs? I mean, Wisconsin is playing for the conference title solely based on the fact that they play in the weaker division. If they were in the East, they would at very best be 3rd in the division. How is that fair? When you're objectively comparing an entire team's season, you can't just look at one game.
It's all about the fingers.In all seriousness why is it the BIG 14? The PAC 10 went to the PAC 12?
To be fair JT Barrett knows how to count past .08% with a little helpAt least Penn State can add....
2 boys + 2 boys = A Good Time, and nothing at all.
My apologies in advance!
Or at the very least 100% of Division or Conference winners, no?Should be 100%...
That would level the play off field as well. They wouldnt have to push so hard to find reasons for teams to get in. In a 6-8 team CFP. I think you see the committee ranking OSU no higher than 5 right most likely lower.With PSU and Wisconsin ahead of them heading into the CCG.Loser would drop outOr at the very least 100% of Division or Conference winners, no?
It's just weird that a team can claim to be the best of 128 when they're not even the best of 7.
I could reconcile that fact pretty easy if there were more than 4 getting the opportunity to call themselves the best of the best b/c there would be a tournament that proves otherwise and not just one hell of a Coach who can easily go on a 2 game win streak...
That would level the play off field as well. They wouldnt have to push so hard to find reasons for teams to get in. In a 6-8 team CFP. I think you see the committee ranking OSU no higher than 5 right most likely lower.With PSU and Wisconsin ahead of them heading into the CCG.Loser would drop out
Yes I meant or Which just goes to show how bad it is when math is corrected by a stoners I agree expanding the play off doesn't only level the playing field. But it impacts the standings by changing the politics. However I would like to see the politics removed.And a much more viable determination of the best team. A clearer set of guidelines. Where H2H and Championships play much more of a role.Otherwise its a watered down regular season imo
Except I think you mean PSU OR Whisky not and...
I imagine if there were 3 B1G teams to get in this year, in a greater field NT tournament than four, it would be PSU OR Whisky (B1G CCG Champ) tOSU and Michigan.
Me too, and maybe, just maybe if they expanded the playoffs to 68 teams (That is ~53% like the NBA & NHL) my Bruins might get in...Yes I meant or Which just goes to show how bad it is when math is corrected by a stoners I agree expanding the play off doesn't only level the playing field. But it impacts the standings by changing the politics. However I would like to see the politics removed.And a much more viable determination of the best team. A clearer set of guidelines. Where H2H and Championships play much more of a role.Otherwise its a watered down regular season imo
True true its all about the resumeMe too, and maybe, just maybe if they expanded the playoffs to 68 teams (That is ~53% like the NBA & NHL) my Bruins might get in...
If they didn't, I surely would be on here complaining!!!
Just look at all of them quality losses!
It's all about the resume my man, all about the resume!
Now that's funny. Well done.Just look at all of them quality losses!
Look vitamike I can count how many points Ohio State scored in the play offs with no handsIt's all about the fingers.
They're above counting toes in that part of the country.
They're sufisticated folks!
So can they....Look vitamike I can count how many points Ohio State scored in the play offs with no hands
They can count to zero