evolver115
Garage League
100M?
they pretty much already did
just didn't come with an actual deed
This is true.
100M?
they pretty much already did
just didn't come with an actual deed
I mean......if you were an insurance company, would you insure that contract?
I wouldn't.....until the federal government stepped in and forced me to
I mean......if you were an insurance company, would you insure that contract?
I wouldn't.....until the federal government stepped in and forced me to
Backstrom did not have the injury before the contract though, so I am sure it was easier to insure.
I never said the contract was bad or risky (quite the contrary, in fact), I said that if I was LoL I would probably not insure it.
Insurance companies offer teams protection against career-ending injuries, but Crosby’s concussion history is considered a pre-existing condition. If Crosby cannot finish his contract because of a concussion-related injury, he will still be paid in full, but the Penguins would not receive assistance from an insurance policy on the deal, sources said.
However, this will not cripple the franchise like the ailing health of current majority co-owner Mario Lemieux did in the 1990s, a sports business expert said.
“It’s so different now for the Penguins. They’ve got a sold-out new arena, a better TV deal, big sponsorship and deeper-pocketed ownership,” said Lynn Lashbrook, president of Portland, Ore.-based Sports Management World Wide. “The Penguins can withstand this even if Crosby can’t play out the majority of this contract.”
Then why would you have reservations about insuring the contract? You said just a few posts ago that if you were the insurance company, you wouldn't insure it.
I mean......if you were an insurance company, would you insure that contract?
I wouldn't.....until the federal government stepped in and forced me to
I
AM
SAYING
THAT
I
AGREE
WITH
THE
OPT OUT!!!!!
THAT IS ALL
WTF!!!!
READ WHAT I POST, FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!!
my point was "of course they had an opt out clause, would you insure that contract otherwise"
It was in response to the post above and maybe the inference was not clear.