Richard Sherman where you at buddy?

[Battlelyon]

Richard Sherman refuses to speak to media after being ?exposed? | ProFootballTalk

After the game, he refused to talk to the media.

But later cowardly sent a tweet, stating “Lmao Exposed? …. Complete 3 passes 0 touchdowns 0 explosive passes…. These guys make me laugh,” Sherman said."

 

[bksballer89]

Exposed is a strong word.

But to not talk to the media is a bitch move and make you come across as a sore loser

 

[bksballer89]

BTW Sherman got the stats wrong.

Rivers was 5-5 for 60 yards when throwing to receivers that Sherman was covering

 

[HubertJubberman]

That guy is a damn joke. Not exposed but damn man, MAN THE FUCK UP!

 

[HaroldSeattle]

That guy is a damn joke. Not exposed but damn man, MAN THE FUCK UP!

Obviously over rated and such.

 

[SeattleCoug]

Exposed is a strong word.

But to not talk to the media is a bitch move and make you come across as a sore loser

I cant argue with that, sums it up perfectly unfortunately.

 

[WizardHawk]

BTW Sherman got the stats wrong.

Rivers was 5-5 for 60 yards when throwing to receivers that Sherman was covering

No, actually Sherman was right. Not saying avoiding the media was right, but the announcers were not correct in the data they were showing. Seattle runs a lot of zones and I believe they put a couple of those on Sherman when he had already split to his priority shift in coverage. I mean no doubt they hit at least 5 passes to that side while he was on it, but who you ultimately put the reception on may not always be so straight up.

He didn't have his best game though. He bit on several moves we don't normally see him bite on. But he wasn't alone. Really sub par performance for that entire defense.

 

[GNG]

That guy is a damn joke. Not exposed but damn man, MAN THE FUCK UP!

Sherman doesn't have the nads to man up.

 

[GNG]

No, actually Sherman was right. Not saying avoiding the media was right, but the announcers were not correct in the data they were showing. Seattle runs a lot of zones and I believe they put a couple of those on Sherman when he had already split to his priority shift in coverage. I mean no doubt they hit at least 5 passes to that side while he was on it, but who you ultimately put the reception on may not always be so straight up.

He didn't have his best game though. He bit on several moves we don't normally see him bite on. But he wasn't alone. Really sub par performance for that entire defense.

The Seahawks blew their wad against Green Bay.

 

[WizardHawk]

The Seahawks blew their wad against Green Bay.

Naw, they have had bad games before. The heat was likely a factor, but tip your hat to one hell of a great performance from Rivers and that offense. They just didn't miss much all day and chewed up that game clock.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

He absolutely was not exposed but as others have said he is a sore losing coward. He can talk it all day but can't take it.

Great player though no doubt about it.

 

[Scooby-Doo]

Great player, but this is exactly why people don't like him. If your gonna dish it out, you gotta be able to take it.

 

[wazzu31]

Was I the only one who thought he jacked up his shoulder? Looked like he was on his way out of the game right before they ran out to ET.

 

[Caliskinsfan]

K, this made me laugh...

 

[always]

I know Sherman had this coming because he's got a loudmouth.

All I saw was him allowing some completions. No touchdowns or big plays.

Are we really going to get on him because some people who were covered by him caught passes.

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

He absolutely was not exposed but as others have said he is a sore losing coward. He can talk it all day but can't take it.

Great player though no doubt about it.

This

Definitely one of the top CBs in the game, but he should have more class than that.

 

[Robotech]

At least he's consistent. Win or lose, he's gonna be a poor sport about it.

 

[bksballer89]

I know Sherman had this coming because he's got a loudmouth.

All I saw was him allowing some completions. No touchdowns or big plays.

Are we really going to get on him because some people who were covered by him caught passes.

I don't think anyone is getting on him for his play today in the media at least.

 

[WizardHawk]

K, this made me laugh...

[MEDIA=twitter]511341240789778432[/MEDIA]

Sorry cali, but neither the person who posted that, nor anyone who buys into it, has ever seen a cover 3 defense it seems.

Sherman's responsibility on that play is the right side of the field. They DO look like man coverage if the wide out goes down that side of the field, but he does NOT follow in-breaking routes. This is why you see him step back after he breaks.

It's funny if people don't know football, but sad when they do.

 

[Caliskinsfan]

Sorry cali, but neither the person who posted that, nor anyone who buys into it, has ever seen a cover 3 defense it seems.

Sherman's responsibility on that play is the right side of the field. They DO look like man coverage if the wide out goes down that side of the field, but he does NOT follow in-breaking routes. This is why you see him step back after he breaks.

It's funny if people don't know football, but sad when they do.

I think it's funny either way myself. Again, I laughed.