PhantomWarrior
Well-Known Member
No one really cares about what you eat.
I would hope not.Are there really any possibilities for this Sale thing? We talked about this some a while ago and I don't think anyone was interested for what it would take. Has that changed with any of you? My guess it would take at least 3 big names, including Profar and Gallo.
I think the two starters would be more valuable at this point. Our pen will be fine with Kela, Diekman, Bush, and Dyson.
Chi Chi is getting knocked around again tonight. That kid has something wrong with him physically I believe.
Just curious where you guys stand- how much blame for the poor pitching do you place at Doug Brocail's feet? A lot, a little, none at all?
It's a hard thing to tell just how much influence he has or how much he has changed stuff. Some guys seemed to have regressed, guys like Perez, Holland, Tolleson, Chi-Chi, NMart, Wilhelmsen (while he was here). All of that could have nothing to do with Brocail, though.
I would hope not.
Just curious where you guys stand- how much blame for the poor pitching do you place at Doug Brocail's feet? A lot, a little, none at all?
It's a hard thing to tell just how much influence he has or how much he has changed stuff. Some guys seemed to have regressed, guys like Perez, Holland, Tolleson, Chi-Chi, NMart, Wilhelmsen (while he was here). All of that could have nothing to do with Brocail, though.
I didn't even consider him a problem at all until I read how Perez was "flying open" and it took until the 3rd inning the other night to find that out. Even then it appears Perez diagnosed the problem himself according to the story. Now I think Brocail is a problem. A bunch of guys have regressed. I had never considered that before, but there are a whole lot of pitching problems from guys who used to be much better.Just curious where you guys stand- how much blame for the poor pitching do you place at Doug Brocail's feet? A lot, a little, none at all?
It's a hard thing to tell just how much influence he has or how much he has changed stuff. Some guys seemed to have regressed, guys like Perez, Holland, Tolleson, Chi-Chi, NMart, Wilhelmsen (while he was here). All of that could have nothing to do with Brocail, though.
That question was broached on one of the stations I was flipping through today. And to me it seems like one of those, "how can you really know?"
The names you just rattled off is rather extensive. But Holland was problematic going into the season, and Gonzalez/Martinez were big questions. Perez is the one which has shocked me with how mentally weak he is now as compared to what he was before.
Just curious where you guys stand- how much blame for the poor pitching do you place at Doug Brocail's feet? A lot, a little, none at all?
It's a hard thing to tell just how much influence he has or how much he has changed stuff. Some guys seemed to have regressed, guys like Perez, Holland, Tolleson, Chi-Chi, NMart, Wilhelmsen (while he was here). All of that could have nothing to do with Brocail, though.