Sleepy T
....zzzz...
Again, you forget that most of these elites have been playing the position for any where from 8-12 years longer than Kirk, and in all cases starting for that entire time.
But I get it, you think we should maintain the option to go in another direction, never mind that more often than not doing that sets a team back. If we were talking Jason Campbell here, I would understand.
Im wondering how many after a missed throw will point out "See thats why we cant or shouldnt sign him long term. Yet after good games will point out that he should have done better with the talent around him.
Damn you guys are a tough crowd! Lol. If you don't tow the KC company line then somehow you are a hater. I was simply debating the point you made. I'm in no way implying that KC won't be a solid QB for years to come, just saying.. Until he wins something that means something, He is not going to be considered in the same sentence as these other guys.
--Aaron Rodgers rode the pine for the better part of 3 years behind Favre, Same as KC. Won the SB in year 3 as a starter.
--Brady led the talented Pats to the SB title in his 2nd year.
--Wilson, Same a Brady, won Super Bowl year 2.
...And FWIW, KCs first few years as QB isn't head and shoulders above what Campbell was wrt wins and losses. Obviously I think KC is a much better QB, but just for comparisons sake, KC hasn't won much more.