terpsfball09
Crabcakes and ACL tears
Well that's some bullshit.
It also says on traderumors that the question was the rangers about garza though... which logical sense would sorta indicate otherwise. I mean the rangers were the ones asking the cubs about garza, so why would they not know every risk about him medically? Doesn't really add up. I like the traderumors site, I just don't think it, or the sources it quotes, are accurate all the time.
Well that's some bullshit.
Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times reports (via Twitter) that the Cubs can select right-hander Neil Ramirez as the PTBNL in the deal. However, if the Cubs select Ramirez, they will not receive a second PTBNL. Otherwise, they can select two other pitchers from the agreed upon list of names
Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times reports (via Twitter) that the Cubs can select right-hander Neil Ramirez as the PTBNL in the deal. However, if the Cubs select Ramirez, they will not receive a second PTBNL. Otherwise, they can select two other pitchers from the agreed upon list of names
If Ramirez is the PTBNL, the Rangers gave up their best INF prospect and best pitching prospect, plus 2 other players, for Matt freaking Garza. How in the world is that a good deal? And whether Garza resigns or not is immaterial. The trade as is has nothing to do with next season.
I just heard the player wasn't Olt I guess. Maybe I misunderstood the message. By him saying it "wasn't olt" I assumed it was one of our other players. Didn't think it was Garza. But either way, we gave up a shitload for him. Olt AND Ramirez AND CJ AND Grimm?Don't you think that was just a ploy by JD to keep Odor. He could be a future player here or trade piece for something else. Based that Ramirez was not on the deal he must have been the issue.
If Ramirez is the PTBNL, the Rangers gave up their best INF prospect and best pitching prospect, plus 2 other players, for Matt freaking Garza. How in the world is that a good deal? And whether Garza resigns or not is immaterial. The trade as is has nothing to do with next season.
What you are saying sounds just like thse who were ticked off for giving Seattle Smoak, Blevin and 2 others for Lee and a lousy Lowe. Olt was blocked and I am okay with him being gone.
How on earth is whether or not Garza resigns with us immaterial? Sure nobody knows as of now, which is part of the story...the trade may affect next season in several ways.If Ramirez is the PTBNL, the Rangers gave up their best INF prospect and best pitching prospect, plus 2 other players, for Matt freaking Garza. How in the world is that a good deal? And whether Garza resigns or not is immaterial. The trade as is has nothing to do with next season.
I just heard the player wasn't Olt I guess. Maybe I misunderstood the message. By him saying it "wasn't olt" I assumed it was one of our other players. Didn't think it was Garza. But either way, we gave up a shitload for him. Olt AND Ramirez AND CJ AND Grimm?
I just heard the player wasn't Olt I guess. Maybe I misunderstood the message. By him saying it "wasn't olt" I assumed it was one of our other players. Didn't think it was Garza. But either way, we gave up a shitload for him. Olt AND Ramirez AND CJ AND Grimm?
I just heard the player wasn't Olt I guess. Maybe I misunderstood the message. By him saying it "wasn't olt" I assumed it was one of our other players. Didn't think it was Garza. But either way, we gave up a shitload for him. Olt AND Ramirez AND CJ AND Grimm?
grimm number 3-4 guy in the future Edwards number 4-5 guy. Olt was blocked. Don't know much about rameriz
grimm number 3-4 guy in the future Edwards number 4-5 guy. Olt was blocked. Don't know much about rameriz
grimm number 3-4 guy in the future Edwards number 4-5 guy. Olt was blocked. Don't know much about rameriz