RamCub
Well-Known Member
Have I mentioned how much I like Johnny Football! (TM)
I mostly agree with this...I'm all for trading Bradford, but only if we can get value for him. Certainly not a few mid-round picks and swapping firsts with the Vikings. Look what some of these other loser QBs got--I think Bradford is at least on the level of that paper mache arm Alex Smith.
So everybody would now be happy with trading Bradford for beans and then drafting an unknown commodity and a HUGE risk in Manziel? If that's the case might as well also have the players sit on their helmets because we're getting horned right up the wazoo....
I'm not so sure about that. The Texans, Jaguars and Raiders look like they might postpone their QB search for another year and who knows how many teams will be looking for a QB next year. Winston also doesn't appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed....it might just be tank for Mariotta next year.We can always trade up to get our guy in 2015...
I'm not so sure about that. The Texans, Jaguars and Raiders look like they might postpone their QB search for another year and who knows how many teams will be looking for a QB next year. Winston also doesn't appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed....it might just be tank for Mariotta next year.
If you're a GM, this has to be the year you make a call on Bradford. He is either Snead's guy or he isn't.
The success rate on late round QBs is something like 2 for 60 or something equally grotesque.
How is the success rate measured?I'm not so sure about that. The Texans, Jaguars and Raiders look like they might postpone their QB search for another year and who knows how many teams will be looking for a QB next year. Winston also doesn't appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed....it might just be tank for Mariotta next year.
If you're a GM, this has to be the year you make a call on Bradford. He is either Snead's guy or he isn't.
The success rate on late round QBs is something like 2 for 60 or something equally grotesque.
The theory was thrown around by former Bears GM who says that only Foles and Wilson have been any good after the 2nd round since 2006 which I think is somewhere around 2 for 60.How is the success rate measured?
I have no idea, however in the last decade (give or take a year) 2 QB's have started in Superbowl's who were undrafted (Warner/Delhomme) and 4 were picked in rounds 3-4-6 (Wilson/Gannon/Brady). Now I will concede 7 were 1st rounders (Peyton/Eli/Flaco/Rodgers/Roethlisberger/Grossman/McNabb) but still those odds don't seem overwhelming and nothing near 2 for 60.
Besides, this is such a deep draft and as you point out some may postpone until next year so even the QB's will slide this year. So who knows Mettenberger or McCarron maybe even Murray can be that guy in round three or four. With enough talent around any of these guys, they could be starting in a Superbowl.