Good question
Mt. Rushmore?? Yeah but here's what it will look like!
Not a trump fan and he says muellar is wrong ! Missed that on too on fox sty
Again my position is verified so maybe my lawyer abilities are decent .
You are innocent until proven guilty , a concept liberals don’t get . Accusations aren’t enough nor should they . I don’t give a fuck about numbers of allegations in a report . Bottom line is he couldn’t prove one. With every democratic donor in the free world working for him . And let’s not forget ole strzok either .
too bad it isnt BSHow in the hell do you get from actual facts that your position has been verified? Thus far, all you've posted is a bunch of propogandist nonsense, clap trap drivel, and spin. I could match you post for post refuting some of the dumb stuff that you've posted, but that moves my steady unbreakable drumbeat of fact based information to a level of tit for tat distraction. In fact, you could recruit the entire looney right to this thread and not one of them could refute the fact that in the report there were at least 10 incidences of obstruction, and nearly 200 incidences of conspiracy.
See what I did there? Stayed on point, laughed at the attempt to move from fact to conjecture and stuck to my point which in fact is supported by the Mueller report. Have fun posting more bullshit!
so there is a difference of opinion , hmmmm , now i bet levin agrees with my position on muellar, and his BS . are you willing to support that ? doubtfulTake all of your previous posts ball them up and throw them in the rubbish because here's one of your own explaining why they are all wrong.
Levin: Trump CANNOT be indicted, say DOJ memoranda ...
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/levin-trump-cannot-be-indicted-say-doj-memoranda
again it refutes your BSWow, breaking news, an disgraced liar, lies without shame!
and your point sty is what ? a biased group of HRC donors makes me believe shit went down with a fake dossier the british said was crap and was used despite our fisa laws signed off by obama flunkiesTry J. Edgar Hoover's FBI, Bush's CIA, and the 1870 DOJ forward and then you've got it!
all of them have and there are as credible as the crap you verified with . when you are done playing the source game let me knowHow in the hell do you get from actual facts that your position has been verified? Thus far, all you've posted is a bunch of propogandist nonsense, clap trap drivel, and spin. I could match you post for post refuting some of the dumb stuff that you've posted, but that moves my steady unbreakable drumbeat of fact based information to a level of tit for tat distraction. In fact, you could recruit the entire looney right to this thread and not one of them could refute the fact that in the report there were at least 10 incidences of obstruction, and nearly 200 incidences of conspiracy.
See what I did there? Stayed on point, laughed at the attempt to move from fact to conjecture and stuck to my point which in fact is supported by the Mueller report. Have fun posting more bullshit!
Keep sticking with the tag line, I'll be here to help you out when you face that hard fall that coming your way!so there is a difference of opinion , hmmmm , now i bet levin agrees with my position on muellar, and his BS . are you willing to support that ? doubtful
its pretty simple being exasperated over a BS investigation based on a fraud isnt a crime . no collusion no obstruction