politics thread

[skinsdad62]

made up? lol. Keep telling yourself that. This site trumps all? lol. So you are saying everyone on this site agrees with the 2 and 1 play call?

i am saying it isnt a big deal , the defense should hold for 65 seconds no matter who the qb is . in fact dak scored on the next play mismanaging the clock even further in your warped world of MMqb.ing

 

[gkekoa]

made up? lol. Keep telling yourself that. This site trumps all? lol. So you are saying everyone on this site agrees with the 2 and 1 play call?

You still misunderstand.

Agreeing/disagreeing with the call is not the same as poor management. I would have ran it because it had been so effective.

 

[deanpet21]

i am saying it isnt a big deal , the defense should hold for 65 seconds no matter who the qb is . in fact dak scored on the next play mismanaging the clock even further in your warped world of MMqb.ing

its not mmqbing. im not explaining this whole thing again.

 

[gkekoa]

its not mmqbing. im not explaining this whole thing again.

It is absolutely MMQBing if you wouldn't be mad if it worked.

Answer this...2nd and 3 from the 12 with just under three minutes to go and you are down three...is it a bad call to throw the ball?

 

[skinsdad62]

its not mmqbing. im not explaining this whole thing again.

it is , you are trouble shooting a coaches choice after the fact which by definition is MMQB'ng period , that is what you are doing and dont deny it , that is what it is

they tried to get points when the opportunity arises , you can whine about that all you want but that choice should have stood up . the fact is 6 seconds later they run it in making the play mute before it

 

[deanpet21]

It is absolutely MMQBing if you wouldn't be mad if it worked.

Answer this...2nd and 3 from the 12 with just under three minutes to go and you are down three...is it a bad call to throw the ball?

im not playing your hypothetical games. I explained everything about the 2nd and 1 call.

 

[deanpet21]

it is , you are trouble shooting a coaches choice after the fact which by definition is MMQB'ng period , that is what you are doing and dont deny it , that is what it is

they tried to get points when the opportunity arises , you can whine about that all you want but that choice should have stood up . the fact is 6 seconds later they run it in making the play mute before it

this is where you are wrong. the play before it doesn't make it mute b/c that play STOPPED THE CLOCK. Why cant you understand clock mgt?

 

[skinsdad62]

im not playing your hypothetical games. I explained everything about the 2nd and 1 call.

you have been playing hypothetical games since the beginning of the thread

 

[skinsdad62]

this is where you are wrong. the play before it doesn't make it mute b/c that play STOPPED THE CLOCK. Why cant you understand clock mgt?

it made it mute they scored 6 damn seconds later anyway . stopping the clock made no difference because they lined up and scored

 

[deanpet21]

you have been playing hypothetical games since the beginning of the thread

no. just saying it was a bad call. GB should have never had that much time plus a timeout to beat Dallas.

 

[deanpet21]

it made it mute they scored 6 damn seconds later anyway . stopping the clock made no difference because they lined up and scored

WOW!!! Of course it did. There would have been less time on the board if they ran it on 2 and 1. By passing it GB saved a timeout plus had enough time to tie or beat you.

 

[skinsdad62]

no. just saying it was a bad call. GB should have never had that much time plus a timeout to beat Dallas.

BS you were assuming a future (hypothetical TD ) could be scored later when in fact you have know idea what would have taken place . penalties, turn overs or the defense simply stopping them on downs all could be in play and you are assuming play would go the way YOU think it would

 

[skinsdad62]

WOW!!! Of course it did. There would have been less time on the board if they ran it on 2 and 1. By passing it GB saved a timeout plus had enough time to tie or beat you.

maybe not , elliot or dak fumbles and game over

 

[deanpet21]

BS you were assuming a future (hypothetical TD ) could be scored later when in fact you have know idea what would have taken place . penalties, turn overs or the defense simply stopping them on downs all could be in play and you are assuming play would go the way YOU think it would

No Im saying Dallas still would of have the time to score a td.

 

[gkekoa]

im not playing your hypothetical games. I explained everything about the 2nd and 1 call.

So we can assume you think that was a mistake to. That damn Bellicheck must suck too and that was probably even a worse call because he did that with more time left on the clock. Maybe we should just take away that SB against the Seahawks.

This is where you run into a huge problem. Nobody plays like you are thinking they should...even the best of all time.

 

[skinsdad62]

maybe not , elliot or dak fumbles and game over

you can face palm me to the cows come home , you get the points when you can because you dont ever KNOW the future

 

[gkekoa]

this is where you are wrong. the play before it doesn't make it mute b/c that play STOPPED THE CLOCK. Why cant you understand clock mgt?

And had they run it on the play where they threw to Dez, theoretically, they would have scored a TD because that happened on the next play. So that would have left even more time on the clock for Rodgers.

 

[skinsdad62]

No Im saying Dallas still would of have the time to score a td.

and they could just as easily turn the ball over you dont damn know

 

[gkekoa]

im not playing your hypothetical games. I explained everything about the 2nd and 1 call.

My scenario was actually not a hypothetical. It was a fact in history where Bellicheck chose to pass. So answer the question...is Bellicheck a bad coach? Does he not know what he is doing? That dumb ass.

 

[deanpet21]

and they could just as easily turn the ball over you dont damn know

Of course you cant predict the future. by your reasoning you think that there isn't a bad play call ever. I have yet to find one Cowboy fan who agreed with that 2nd an 1 play call. Between the sport bar, work, and Gym I have talked to about over 20 people who are Cowboy fans. Not one said they agreed with that play call even if Dez scored. Every person has said the same thing. You leave Rodgers too much time to tie or win the game regardless of the outcome of the play. So its not mmqbing when the play call doesn't make sense from the start.