- Thread starter
- #2,361
Man Who Assaulted MAGA Teen at Whataburger Has Been IDENTIFIED
More crap from the left , now a teen is the victim
More crap from the left , now a teen is the victim
Man Who Assaulted MAGA Teen at Whataburger Has Been IDENTIFIED
More crap from the left , now a teen is the victim
stupid white girl.Border Patrol Agents Arrest Yuma Resident and Seize $158K of Meth | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
But it’s racist Trump’s fault not the mother of the 2 yr old
dumbass white girl.Border Patrol Agents Arrest Yuma Resident and Seize $158K of Meth | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
But it’s racist Trump’s fault not the mother of the 2 yr old
stupid white girl.
dumbass white girl.
According to the Guardians Tally of the approximately 1001 people killed by police in 2015 in America 502 are white , 250 are black , 163 are Hispanic 18 were Asian /pacific , 13 American Indian and 54 other/unknown . Not only are these figures show that in real . numbers that whites are killed more often then police then blacks but when contrasted in proportion to the crimes rates of each group whites are in fact more likely to be killed then any other race . Of the 566 police related shootings so far this year 279 were white 136 were black .
Now the press and other " advocacy " groups will have you believe that police target. Minorities for execution. The above numbers don't bare that out at all . That doesn't mean that these shootings were justifiable . What these numbers suggest is that we are being mislead by people with ulterior motives
1- I am not sure how that is threatening the press with anything other than what is appropriate. The press cannot go around putting out information that is wrong about people. That is libel. If guilty of putting out fake news, that lisence should be challenged, and if appropriate revoked. Much of the news being put out is FAKE.
Where did I say I am OK with him pardoning himself? I said technically he can. The problem is he can’t. You can’t pardon a person for a crime when the crime has never been charged. So if he were guilty of a crime, he would be impeached, then the charges brought, and he would be unable. I want all politicians to be held to a higher standard, not a lower one according to law. I think they should all be investigated.
Who said loyal to Trump over the country? I want the FBI to do their job and not go after a sitting POTUS or candidate without credible information.
11- You believe it is harmful to the nation. That doesn’t make it so.
1 - saying their licenses should be revoked isnt inappropriate? If it's libel take them to court. Most of it is not fake it's just a slant you don't like.
*shrug* the evidence suggests it is harmful to this country. It's not just some willy nilly feeling.
everyone has ties ebb . just because you do/did business with them doesnt make you guilty of a crime.praising dictators isnt a crime either . sorry to burst your bubble but in the real world countries have to talk/negotiate with dictators
the press has been acting like the enemy . what do you call slanting coverage one way , pushing agendas the people dont want and constantly attacking the duly elected president
do you honestly think russia hasnt meddlde in our elections since 1917 ? do you honestly think russia/ n vietnam didnt have agents in those Vietnam protests ?
show me evidence of a crime ? almost 2 years and no evidence of anything from trump did .
the premise of your question is wrong
what you should be asking is do i want my president not knowing how to handle classified information? people like me who have handled classified information know she is lying and KNOW if we did the same thing we would be in jail . does a known Trump hater get to alter wording in such a manner as to protect his favorite candidate and having her avoid charges ? and it gets to be called credible ? peter strozk did that , he was the lead investigator in the clinton case and then joined the mueller team . he said he would STOP DJT from being elected and he had an insurance policy to keep him from taking office . only someone who is a hater or totally naive would argue that is on the up and up
should my president be held accountable for bleach bitting 30000 subpoened emails . do innocent people destroy cell phones under subpeona ?
does one candidate get to rig a primary election against another ?
should justice be handled equally ? do you exonerate a suspect BEFORE she is interviewed ? do you give immunity to people surrounding one campaign but fail to do the same to the other ?
does a fair press give one campaign the questions to a debate but not the other ? should one candidate have to debate alleged moderators as well as the opposing candidate ? does a fair press get focus all its stories to about a 90% negative and 10 % positive and not be told its extremely biased ?
does a press get to use photos from their favorite president time period and pass them off as the current ones and be called credible ?
do you allow lead inspectors to investigate their favorite candidate , then turn around and let the investigate the guy they hate and expect fairness ?
should the FBI and the DOJ be allowed to rig elections ? . should a sitting president be allowed to spy on an opposition candidates campaign without probable cause . should anyone in law enforce be allowed to lie or cover-up information when applying for a fisa warrant
this "investigation" is turning up this and if you watched news other then the MSM 24-7 you would have know about this 18 months ago . or else you just dont like trump and dont care how you get rid of him . but be careful because the same tactics can be used against someone you like
Why would I stop saying it is an illegal warrant? The warrant was illegal.
Apparently. If the FBI omitted (suppressed) where they got the information, then yes it is a crime of perjury.
If you don’t know the crime committed by an individual, you can’t have probable cause of a crime. Obama colluded in Israel’s election with Netanyahu’s opposition to the tune of hundreds of thousands in tax payer money. So why is it ok for us to interfere in the election of other countries but think it is bad when they do it?
The essence of the immigration debate and the lack of any intelligent response