Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
I didn’t run like a butch. There was a post where I said I’m not sure this is correct cause someone else said it. I just didn’t take the time to verify
Where's that post?
I didn’t run like a butch. There was a post where I said I’m not sure this is correct cause someone else said it. I just didn’t take the time to verify
Where's that post?
Exactly. But hypothetically shouldn’t there be a penalty on Atlanta for hitting a QB giving himself up.
The call was correct, just needs to be fixed
Go look for it. It was days ago. I said someone said “He had 3 drives and went 7-10”. I should have verified it. I think it’s on this thread
Exactly. But hypothetically shouldn’t there be a penalty on Atlanta for hitting a QB giving himself up.
The call was correct, just needs to be fixed.
Where's that post?
You're an uneducated clown. I told you that you were wrong four hours before Manster posted that vid.Earlier I admitted I was completely wrong after I saw Mansters video
It's your post you claim you made, bring it forth or at least give us the post number. I gave the post number of the video you questioned.Go look for it. It was days ago. I said someone said “He had 3 drives and went 7-10”. I should have verified it. I think it’s on this thread
This I will agree with, and in all honesty I thought the rule to give yourself up was to slide.You could make that argument, I suppose, but is that where we want football headed?
In my opinion, the issue isn’t that the defender hit him, it’s that the QB was ruled to have given himself up when everyone in the world knows that that’s not what he intended. The fact that he was deemed down AND also hit by the defender just sort of shows that the rule is stupid.
You're an uneducated clown. I told you that you were wrong four hours before Manster posted that vid.
You even admitted you were wrong.
You tried moving the goal posts and got outed by almost the entire hoop.
I've asked you before please stop posting. You're starting to embbarass 3rd world educators.
Kudos good pointWoah, hold on, and give up the entertainment?
Well for starters you need to know how Internet Addresses work.Huhh? PhiladelphiaEagles.com
I don’t know how to do all that computer shit
This I will agree with, and in all honesty I thought the rule to give yourself up was to slide.
As for this play I do think the defender touched Wentz pre goal line, but the video evidence looks to be inconclusive, so the play would've stayed as called.
Now the mistake was going for 2, has the Eagles taken the 1, they'd have been within 3 and in field goal position to try to tie for OT at the end.
I think if they just kicked the XP, it would have been 17-13. My guess is they again just kick the XP after their next touchdown and make it 20-17 (same as it ended up being). So I’m not sure going for 2 and failing impacted anything in this exact situation.
Regardless, I didn’t have an issue with it because the Eagles offense hadn’t done much to that point. It seemed more likely their next scoring opportunity would be a FG than a TD, so trying to get within 3 made sense to me. Plus I know Doug is aggressive so I sort of expect it at this point.
My mistake I thought the missed 2 points was their last TD.I think if they just kicked the XP, it would have been 17-13. My guess is they again just kick the XP after their next touchdown and make it 20-17 (same as it ended up being). So I’m not sure going for 2 and failing impacted anything in this exact situation.
Regardless, I didn’t have an issue with it because the Eagles offense hadn’t done much to that point. It seemed more likely their next scoring opportunity would be a FG than a TD, so trying to get within 3 made sense to me. Plus I know Doug is aggressive so I sort of expect it at this point.
I think 2 points would have brought them to within 3. If that’s right then going for 2 was the absolute right call.
In fact, on the falcons next possession they had the pick in the end zone. I remember thinking that was big bc a FG makes it an 8 point game.
Still can’t believe the falcons won that game.
You’re telling me. Couldn’t sleep after the game.
Were you able to get to any tracks this summer?
I agree with you about that rule, but two points. First off it doesn't actually matter in this situation because he was down either way. His knee was down AND he was touched. So whether he was a QB, RB, WR, etc he was still down. I think they only quoted the rule at the game because since they had to overturn the call, they need indisputable evidence. It was clear, obvious and indisputable that the knee was down. He was touched too, but that wasn't quite as obvious. So since they already had him down via the QB specific rule they didn't need to go to the "was he touched rule" that covers non-QBs. Hope I explained that as clearly as it was in my head.The call was technically correct but so incredibly wrong they have to change it. A QB diving head first into the end zone I not a QB giving himself up