- Thread starter
- #161
skinz2winz
Well-Known Member
Rogers = Loss
Also doesn’t help when the offense can’t score runs.Rogers = Loss
Rogers = Loss
Also doesn’t help when the offense can’t score runs.
Rogers doesn't help the team now and considering what you gave up to get him, this trade was a failure. Who cares about 2025, our window of opportunity is now and Elias knows that. Poor job of getting this team help now. I know, injuries are not predictable but that shouldn't prevent him from doing his job vs dumpster diving.Trying very hard to put a positive spin on this:
- On the bright side, this could qualify as a "scheduled punt game" since David Peterson has the lowest ERA among the current Mets rotation, and this game would provide yet another data point that Rogers needs to be considered a project to fix for 2025 (as opposed to being a "ready option" for the remainder of the 2024 season).
- The fact that Povich's spot start pushed back everyone else by a day meant that Burnes would get to pitch against the Astros, while Rogers's start that's originally scheduled for the 8/29 (@ LAD) would be pushed back to 8/30 (@ COL) and could theoretically be skipped because of the 8/26 off day.
Aug. 20 Roster Moves: Akin to paternity list, Eflin to 15-day IL, Povich and Tate recalled
God fucking damn it
Rogers doesn't help the team now and considering what you gave up to get him, this trade was a failure. Who cares about 2025, our window of opportunity is now and Elias knows that. Poor job of getting this team help now. I know, injuries are not predictable but that shouldn't prevent him from doing his job vs dumpster diving.
If Burnes goes down before the playoffs, we're done.
Time frame (2024) | Record / Win % | Runs Scored | Runs Allowed | Run differential | Expected record | "Luck" |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of 6/19 (after 73 games) | 48-25, 0.658 (1.5 GB) | 373 (5.11 / game) | 259 (3.55 / game) | +113 (Yankees: +125) | 48-25 | 0 games |
Games #74-126 (53 games) | 25-28, 0.472 | 260 (4.91 / game) | 285 (5.38 / game) | -24 (Yankees: -9) | 24-29 | +1 game |
As of 8/19 (after 126 games) | 73-53, 0.579 (0.5 GB) | 633 (5.03 / game) | 544 (4.32 / game) | +89 (Yankees: +116) | 72-54 | +1 game |
Time frame (2023) | Record / Win % | Runs Scored | Runs Allowed | Run differential | Expected record | "Luck" |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of 6/21 (after 73 games) | 45-28, 0.616 (1.5 GB) | 360 (4.93 / game) | 325 (4.45 / game) | +35 (Rays: +146) | 40-33 | +5 games |
Games #74-126 (53 games) | 33-20, 0.622 | 262 (4.94 / game) | 214 (4.03 / game) | +48 (Rays: +24) | 31-22 | +2 games |
As of 8/23 (after 126 games) | 78-48, 0.619 (2.0 GA) | 622 (4.94 / game) | 539 (4.28 / game) | +83 (Rays: +170) | 71-55 | +7 games |
Maybe it's time for another comparison with 2023 [...]
BTW Cole Irvin is back, YAY
Overreaction of the day: Should have DFA'ed Kimbrel to open up a roster spot for Irvin's spot start (given the depleted bullpen)? Dillon Tate might actually be a better choice at this point...
Theyre being overused because A. the starters arent pitching past the 5th inning or B. it's a blowout and they have to come in. We need a stretch of games where the starters are going 7 strong innings OR get the rare complete game. That hasnt happened in a long while.
Time to keep the bullpen fresh by re-activating the "Nofolk shuttle" (by cycling through pitchers with options as often as needed)? Possible candidates for using this strategy may include: Smith and Selby on the current major league roster, plus Baker / Tate / Vespi (if his 5-option limit for the season hasn't been reached yet) / Zimmermann (if you have to) from AAA.
I just want to believe this rotation can get back to where it was in the beginning of the year. Outside of Tyler Wells the rotation was dominant for the most part, yes even Irvin. What they need to do is move Rogers to the bullpen and give Irvin that spot back if he can get back to his spring form and not the one where he was giving up 4 runs in the bullpen each game. Not to mention the rosters expand in a few weeks so maybe they can call someone else up and get us to a 6 man rotation OR call up one of the starters from AAA and put them in the pen to eat up some innings.
Obviously there's no chance that they would have done this, but the crazy part is that selling high on Burnes might actually have made sense in retrospect:To play devil's advocate, perhaps a better hypothetical question is whether Elias should have considered the unthinkable option of flipping Burnes to another team at the trade deadline.
So apparently the Dodgers are up next....odds of us getting our asses kicked and swept?