- Thread starter
- #1
Beaker
Dragon's Bane
I've known Kentucky is a damn good team since they destroyed Kansas months ago, but seriously? What the hell? This team could beat the Knicks in a 7 game series. This is just unfair. . .
I've known Kentucky is a damn good team since they destroyed Kansas months ago, but seriously? What the hell? This team could beat the Knicks in a 7 game series. This is just unfair. . .
Yeah the college to pro sports comparisons never get old.
Just don't understand why people say it.
Alabama wouldn't beat the 0-16 lions.
UK wouldn't beat the Knicks.
Etc....
Simple fact.
I've known Kentucky is a damn good team since they destroyed Kansas months ago, but seriously? What the hell? This team could beat the Knicks in a 7 game series. This is just unfair. . .
Depends on who the best player on the court is... Team with the best player on the court always has a chance to win even if the rest of the team is not good...
With no Melo, who do the knicks even have??
Kentucky would clearly lose the series, but I could see them pullng off a win or 2
Just wondering... with Carmello out, who would be the best player on the court between Kentucky and the knicks...
I strongly do believe that if Kentucky does have the best player on the court, they could pull off at least one win in a series... But of course they will lose the series...
Just wondering... with Carmello out, who would be the best player on the court between Kentucky and the knicks...
I strongly do believe that if Kentucky does have the best player on the court, they could pull off at least one win in a series... But of course they will lose the series...
It's all about matchups. Kentucky wasn't that scary vs Cincinnati.