- Thread starter
- #841
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
Completely agree. My thing with him is he sees himself as so much smarter than any other person in baseball and in his limited resume it sucked. The Angels were good before him, sucked with him and have returned to making bold moves and spending money. He was given a crappy deck with the contracts and farm system, but burning the farm system and spending money on just dudes doesn't make sense. How in the world does the Alonso deal make sense if they didn't want to resign him? Could've gotten Healy at the deadline, how does shipping off every single highly rated prospect for non needs on your team make sense? I keep using the he is trying to reinvent baseball but baseball isn't like basketball or football where you can come in, change things and have instant success like the Seahawks and Warriors. Those team won right away, then the league caught up, the Warriors adapted with Durant, won. The Seahawks are stuck in their ways and haven't. That's why I don't like his sticking to his philosophy of metrics and making hundreds of moves.
Seattle already has a disadvantage and now he has made it a pitstop organization that can't attract any free agents without bottom feeding or spending resources he already is short on, which he has made the only way to win. He gambled on Segura and Haniger. Segura is a 2B when they have one and Haniger but thus far is more prone to injuries than Paxton.
It's just so confusing what his goal is, and his condescending tone with fans and baseball people in general bugs me.
This was exactly my thought when we traded for him. I was really confused as to what the purpose of trading for Alonso was. Additionally, he was coming off of a ridiculously strange stretch in his career where he discovered power he never had before. He obviously wasn't an optimal long-term option, so I'm not surprised we didn't even consider bringing him back. We only gave up a C-grade prospect for him, but in this organization that's probably good enough to be in the top 10.
I agree on the reinvention of baseball thing.
He has mentioned that we are now in an era where starters don't need to go 6+ innings, and you can see that with his acquisitions:
-Marco Gonzales: 5 inning arm. Looks more like a long reliever to me.
-Erasmo Ramirez: 5 inning arm. Looks more like a long reliever to me.
-David Phelps: Former starter, now a long reliever.
-Juan Nicasio: Former starter, now a long reliever.
It looks like he has some idea in his head that using innings eating bullpen arms in combination with mediocre starts is somehow a recipe for success. Honestly, I think the end result of this will be a lot of shuffling around in the bullpen that will lead to a lot of guys being overworked.