We asked for the #8 prospect in baseball and settle for the 31st ranked prospect. Oh Jerry.
MLB.com 2018 Prospect Watch
I've always secretly wondered why the M's don't use their available money towards getting the best front office and scouting instead of spending $240M on Cano, $63M on Leake, $50M on Gordon ect.
The best group of guys to build the farm is likely far cheaper than signing/trading for high player salaries, no?
Then when the Mariners start pumping out prospect after prospect and have a solid exciting young core, they can slowly add some top guys as the final pieces with the extra money from ticket sales, TV ratings, merchandise ect.
Am I making this more simple than it really is?
Kinda like describing my work place. Lots and lots of short term bandages and no long term solutions from management. It’s typically bad.Rangers beat writer
A lot of people didn’t like the Walker deal either, and that worked out ok. I’m not saying that this is a great deal, but in trades like these I think only time will tell; have to hope for the best. Getting their #1 prospect is a decent start when considering we weren’t ever gonna benefit from Paxton’s abilities moving forward. I just wish we could have dumped a salary in the process. That being said, do a deal like this for Diaz and I would be pissed. We need to deal him, but it better be a haul. If we are truly rebuilding then nobody is off limits.
As Wazzu stated above, I’m not a fan of moving ace caliber pitchers in the offseason especially when he has multiple years of team control left. The benefit of moving a high caliber pitcher during the season is you set yourself up for a bidding war and maximize the return from playoff contenders.
Only way I’d be willing to get rid of an ace in the offseason if it was a blockbuster deal. This was not blockbuster.
They’ve said no one is off limit but I’d be okay if they hold on to him for next year’s deadline.