Eddie_Shack
likes oatmeal lumpy
I don't see how the league can plan any sort of divisional realignment based on how good or bad a team or franchise is. You are basically admitting that the CBA is a sham and that there is no parity.
I agree with this. Unless you literally started all the teams over in one gigantic draft, I don't think those two teams would have success for many years because of the lack of talent. They'd have to rely on a lot of youth combined with washed up talent.
I agree with this. Unless you literally started all the teams over in one gigantic draft, I don't think those two teams would have success for many years because of the lack of talent. They'd have to rely on a lot of youth combined with washed up talent.
i would like 28 teams and max 78 games per season
Conference A
Anaheim
Calgary
Colorado
Edmonton
Los Angeles
San Jose
Vancouver
Chicago
Columbus
Dallas
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg
West
Boston
Buffalo
Detroit
Montreal
Ottawa
Tampa Bay
Toronto
Carolina
New Jersey
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington
While partly true, dont forget about UFA/RFAs. They would have to pay to get to the cap floor. So they would draft other teams bottom 6 guys they would buy their top 6 players. Also entry draft players are playing sooner. I think a three year build would get them up to speed.
I'll see your Eric Boulton and raise you a John Scott...
Side note: how does an expansion draft work? I have NO idea.
I seem to remember a team could protect a certain number at each position. Everyone else can be picked.
Like 1 goalie, 5 D and 9 forwards and if you lost one player at each position you wouldn't lose any more at that position.
It's been a while.
Again, the Ottawa situation in Goal would SUCK for them. Which of your three stud goalies do you protect? Same with St Louis or LA. Vancouver...
Here: 2000 NHL Expansion Draft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Interesting, Bobby Mac just said that there is a possibility with the proposed uneven conferences that the playoffs will go like this:
Top three from each Division in.
Next four are "Wild Card" with the next four best records, regardless of conference.
Hmmm. Hafta think 'bout that.
In my mind the only reason to go to 4 conferences is if you are going to 32 teams, and the league isn't healthy enough for that.
In my mind the only reason to go to 4 conferences is if you are going to 32 teams, and the league isn't healthy enough for that.
so is this a done deal? is it a strongly worded memo?