I think marginally better. QBs in reality only account for 1 or 2 more wins at best the majority of the time. I think the Hawks would likely have beaten the Bengals with Purdy. Geno made some bonehead plays in that one but Pete also completely fucked up so who knows right. The game at the Rams last month is another one that maybe Purdy makes a few more plays than Geno but we still could have won that one but Myers missed the FG. Shit happens kinda thing.
The real comp here is what Geno does in this Niner offense and that is pretty much impossible to predict. My best guess is that Geno does some of the things along the way that JimmyG did. San Fran is still good and a legit contender but you are constantly waiting for the QB to fuck it up because he just doesn't process well enough. Either way, it's only about one win different as I said but come play-off time, that's where the difference really would show. I think Shanahan would be dialing down the offense to suit Geno like he had to do with Jimmy.
I understand what your saying,but no one wants to put the oline Purdy has in fron of him either.....he is hardly under pressure.
Would I take Purdy over Geno....??....absolutley.
Geno was a never was when drafted and found himself last season for whatever reason......
But you would really have to be a horrible qb to not get the 9ers a SB win tjis year.....
Im betting 9er fans wish they had a Geno Smith in that Championship game vs the Eagles last season.......SF wouldve came out on top.
So you put Purdy on that Seattle team tjis seasons or ladt,SF is still sending them home.
And to tell you the truth, I think SF beats the best team in the AFC in Baltimore by 10 this weekend.....