mr.hockey4242
Well-Known Member
Are there really people here trying to argue that Rodgers isn't a great QB?
1 guy. And boy is he looking like a moron. Its fun though.
Are there really people here trying to argue that Rodgers isn't a great QB?
Because why would you run when they have that secondary?
If Brady hadn't committed the cardinal sin and paid the price, he prolly woulda been MVP. That pains me to say, but I believe that. (Not the cardinal sin part, that was for effect.)
I'm talking about this years Packers.What do you mean? I'm talking for the whole year Peyton was a guy who threw do much inside the 5 yard line that him and his center Jeff saturday got into it on anf off the field. It was dfirst and goal on the 1 yard line and he threw the first 2 times. Jeff told Peyton "why don't we run it" and Peyton told him to shut the duck up and he was in charge. Who knows if Brady would have won it but Ryan has the stats and the recors. I'll take Bradys 11-1 record with 2 t/o's. He fumbled the ball 6 times and recovered all 6, so just the 2 picks
Nobody said Rodgers isn't great. It's the ridiculous pedestal he's put on.Are there really people here trying to argue that Rodgers isn't a great QB?
That's bad coaching because they had RBs averaging over 5 yards a carry.Rodgers Led the team in carries tonight.
So, you're saying he's great, but shouldn't be on a pedestal. Got it...Nobody said Rodgers isn't great. It's the ridiculous pedestal he's put on.
I'm talking about this years Packers.
Manning was his own OC. I know this because his OC is our HC now, and he can't make a halftime adjustment to save his season. (49-6 in the second half the last three weeks.)
Like the guy who is a wide receiver who limped off the field?That's bad coaching because they had RBs averaging over 5 yards a carry.
I'm talking about this years Packers.
Manning was his own OC. I know this because his OC is our HC now, and he can't make a halftime adjustment to save his season. (49-6 in the second half the last three weeks.)
Why would this years Packers secondary not affect how often teams run the ball against them?. I still don't understand what this years secondary has to do with running the ball? I showed where 2 guys avg over yards a carry this year and not sure what that Polish guy is averaging now that Lacy is hurt
Like the guy who is a wide receiver who limped off the field?
Or the fullback who's job is to block?
The only other guy with multiple carries was Michael who had six yards.
My bad.Tom Moore was Peyton's OC for 10 years in Indy guys great coaching for 50 years and was your OC back in the day
Why would this years Packers secondary not affect how often teams run the ball against them?
(You mentioned at one point they were best against the run. Their awful coverage is my opinion why that was.)
So you call me stupid and then prove my point. Carr was better in 7 of the first 10 weeks. So yeah, Carr was better in the first 10 weeks just like I fucking said and wouldn't have let the Packers start 4-6. And passer rating won't account for the fact that Carr surrendered TDs to his running game in the first 10 weeks. Carr had several games where he played well but didn't throw many TDs because they actually run the football whereas Rodgers had multi-TD games in games where he wasn't that great and lost. Using passer rating to justify who was better and not taking into account situational football? There's only one person that is fucking stupid here. It's the Viking homer who has Aaron Rodgers' dick far up his asshole.You actually create a new type of stupid.
Yes, first 10 weeks Carr did have a better head to head Passer rating in 7 of them. Congrats one week Carr had a 80.6 to Rodgers 79.8. 3 of the 7 times that Carr had a better passer rating it was by less than 4 pts.
Rodgers in his 8 games that were better than Carrs..............only week 15 saw the gap within 10 pts and at 6 it was still higher than 3 of the games Carr had over Rodgers.
Rodgers fucking SHIT on him this year. There were FOUR games all year where Carr was legitmately better then Rodgers. 25% of the year. THose games were the Falcons, Ravens, Bucs and Texans. Congrats.
Carr threw better against the shitty Falcons D while Rodgers struggled vs the Vikes D everyone was getting shut down by. Throw a parade.
You are really, really fucking stupid.
I was happy to see Polish sausage get those carries. If the Pack could've beat us on the ground, id have been surprised. (We had 8 in the box one play, got nervous. But the blitz actually worked. Lawson got the sack.)I wasn't surprised that ARodg threw for 300 and 4 TDs with another 40 on the ground.You're talking to a guy who says "they don't even try to run on the goal line"
In response to the Packers throwing 1 time(successfully) from the 9 yard.
Can't argue with someone clueless enough to
1. Say something that worked to win the game was dumb
2. Act like they tried it multiple times, when it was an efficient 1/1
3. Think the 9 yard line is the goal line.
I'm saying he shouldn't be in the MVP discussion. I made that clear a long time ago.So, you're saying he's great, but shouldn't be on a pedestal. Got it...
How about this, you're a moron, but we shouldn't dismiss your stupidity? Is that about the same analogy?
I think haters call that stat padding, but I could be wrong.The rush game thing is pretty overblown. Green Bay has the 7th best yards per rush in the league. Theyre 18th in ypg but only 9 ypg from being in the top 10. The reality is they run the ball dine. They simply choose to pass it more than most teams do because that's the style of offense they run.