NFL MVP update

[Earl Stevens]

Like the guy who is a wide receiver who limped off the field?

Or the fullback who's job is to block?

The only other guy with multiple carries was Michael who had six yards.

Maybe if they gave Michael more than 3 carries.

 

[broncosmitty]

I was saying why doesn't GB run the ball more when they have guys avging more than 5 yards carry, not run against them. If your playing the no#1 run D, why try to run a lot, have to throw. And GB had the no#1 ranked run D for awhile this year

I'm saying they had the run D because nobody bothered to run much.

You know they have no RBs, right? A fullback (who had more carries tonight than he did at Oklahoma, for his career. 6 carries- 13 yards the entire time he was in college)a wide receiver and Rodgers had all but six of their rushing yards.

 

[broncosmitty]

Maybe if they gave Michael more than 3 carries.

So you've been trolling this entire time!?!

 

[mr.hockey4242]

So you call me stupid and then prove my point. Carr was better in 7 of the first 10 weeks. So yeah, Carr was better in the first 10 weeks just like I fucking said and wouldn't have let the Packers start 4-6. And passer rating won't account for the fact that Carr surrendered TDs to his running game in the first 10 weeks. Carr had several games where he played well but didn't throw many TDs because they actually run the football whereas Rodgers had multi-TD games in games where he wasn't that great and lost. Using passer rating to justify who was better and not taking into account situational football? There's only one person that is fucking stupid here. It's the Viking homer who has Aaron Rodgers' dick far up his asshole.

Hahahahhaha you prove it yet again. YOU JUST DONT GET IT.

So now passer rating doesn't count? More cherry picking? You do realize that Rodgers won some of the games in those first 10 that Carr was better right?

You also do realize that because Carr played well vs the Falcons D that does not mean he beats the Vikings D...right?

Last week(feel free to go back and watch) the announcers said "the Raiders were just determined to get a pass TD there". When Oakland threw it FIVE straight times inside the 5.

Like I said you are a new breed of stupid. Rodgers shit on Carr 75% of the season. Not 37.5%

Are your parents proud?

 

[rmilia1]

I think haters call that stat padding, but I could be wrong.

It's just the way the league is now. Very few teams run the ball consistently. There's really no need to. Green Bay runs it less than most, not because they can't but because they'd rather have Rodgers throwing it. Like duh... who wouldn't? Lol

 

[broncosmitty]

The rush game thing is pretty overblown. Green Bay has the 7th best yards per rush in the league. Theyre 18th in ypg but only 9 ypg from being in the top 10. The reality is they run the ball fine. They simply choose to pass it more than most teams do because that's the style of offense they run.

They have no players with 500 yards.

Top guy is their 4th receiver. Second guy is their QB.

These were two teams who struggle with a run game on display tonight. (Zenner came up just short of leading the team for the season. And he started two games.)

 

[sonnyblack65]

I'm saying they had the run D because nobody bothered to run much.

You know they have no RBs, right? A fullback (who had more carries tonight than he did at Oklahoma, for his career. 6 carries- 13 yards the entire time he was in college)a wide receiver and Rodgers had all but six of their rushing yards.

I don't follow the Pack but noticed Montgomery averages 6 yards a carry and had 8 carries for 44 yards amd,Ripkowski had 9 carries for 61 yards tonight. So 17 carries for 105 not bad.

 

[Earl Stevens]

Hahahahhaha you prove it yet again. YOU JUST DONT GET IT.

So now passer rating doesn't count? More cherry picking? You do realize that Rodgers won some of the games in those first 10 that Carr was better right?

You also do realize that because Carr played well vs the Falcons D that does not mean he beats the Vikings D...right?

Last week(feel free to go back and watch) the announcers said "the Raiders were just determined to get a pass TD there". When Oakland threw it FIVE straight times inside the 5.

Like I said you are a new breed of stupid. Rodgers shit on Carr 75% of the season. Not 37.5%

Are your parents proud?

Rodgers was 4-6. Carr was 8-2. It's not open heart surgery. Carr was clearly better.

Who gives a fuck about the Vikings or the Falcons? I'm talking about the first 10 games of the year collectively. Carr was better than Rodgers CLEARLY. LOL @ shit on Carr 75% of the season. Yea in the last six games he did.

 

[broncosmitty]

Passing
Rk Player Team Pos Comp Att Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD Int 1st 1st% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck Rate
1 Drew Brees NO QB 471 673 70.0 42.1 5,208 7.7 325.5 37 15 264 39.2 98T 70 10 27 101.7
2 Matt Ryan ATL QB 373 534 69.9 33.4 4,944 9.3 309.0 38 7 238 44.6 76T 69 17 37 117.1
3 Kirk Cousins WAS QB 406 606 67.0 37.9 4,917 8.1 307.3 25 12 225 37.1 80T 69 13 23 97.2
4 Philip Rivers SD QB 349 578 60.4 36.1 4,386 7.6 274.1 33 21 214 37.0 59 57 16 36 87.9
5 Joe Flacco BAL QB 436 672 64.9 42.0 4,317 6.4 269.8 20 15 204 30.4 95T 40 11 33 83.5
6 Andrew Luck IND QB 346 545 63.5 36.3 4,240 7.8 282.7 31 13 206 37.8 64T 61 8 41 96.4
7 Carson Palmer ARI QB 364 597 61.0 39.8 4,233 7.1 282.2 26 14 218 36.5 80T 48 6 40 87.2
8 Russell Wilson SEA QB 353 546 64.7 34.1 4,219 7.7 263.7 21 11 193 35.3 59 51 11 41 92.6
9 Andy Dalton CIN QB 364 563 64.7 35.2 4,206 7.5 262.9 18 8 204 36.2 86T 53 13 41 91.8
10 Aaron Rodgers GB QB 374 571 65.5 38.1 4,128 7.2 275.2 36 7 205 35.9 66T 53 10 34 102.7

What is that list sorted by?

 

[sonnyblack65]

What is that list sorted by?

Yards but has the all the QB stats It doesn't list the best QB's in order Ryan dominates in just about every category, having thrown less

 

[broncosmitty]

I don't follow the Pack but noticed Montgomery averages 6 yards a carry and had 8 carries for 44 yards amd,Ripkowski had 9 carries for 61 yards tonight. So 17 carries for 105 not bad.

The three of them had all but six of their yards. Not just Rodgers.

 

[rmilia1]

They have no players with 500 yards.

Top guy is their 4th receiver. Second guy is their QB.

These were two teams who struggle with a run game on display tonight. (Zenner came up just short of leading the team for the season. And he started two games.)

Numbers are the numbers man. Green Bay runs it just fine regardless of who is back there. They simply choose to throw it more. If I had Rodgers I'd do the same

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Rodgers was 4-6. Carr was 8-2. It's not open heart surgery. Carr was clearly better.

Who gives a fuck about the Vikings or the Falcons? I'm talking about the first 10 games of the year collectively. Carr was better than Rodgers CLEARLY. LOL @ shit on Carr 75% of the season. Yea in the last six games he did.

Holy fuck are you stupid.

So Carr was 8-2 on the Raiders that means he wouldn't be 4-6 on the Packers?

Who gives a fuck about the two teams that they played?

Jesus fucking Christ this is incredible.

 

[Earl Stevens]

So you've been trolling this entire time!?!

Keep making up more excuses for Rodgers. The running game collectively was fine tonight, and yes, that included Rodgers.

 

[broncosmitty]

Yards but has the all the QB stats

I see all the guys with more yards also have more picks and less TDs.

 

[Earl Stevens]

Holy fuck are you stupid.

So Carr was 8-2 on the Raiders that means he wouldn't be 4-6 on the Packers?

Who gives a fuck about the two teams that they played?

Jesus fucking Christ this is incredible.

He wouldn't be 4-6 on the Packers. He would have beat the Colts and Titans just like he actually did this year you fucking idiot. Rodgers didn't beat them. He might have beat the Cowboys too in a game where Rodgers was complete shit.

 

[broncosmitty]

Maybe if they gave Michael more than 3 carries.

This seriously is the dumbest thing I've read all day.

And I've read some real dumb things.

He is not good. And averaged less yards per carry than everyone who got more carries. He was cut this season, for a reason.

I gave you credit by assuming you were trolling.

They won, in spite of Christine Michael not factoring, I guess.

 

[broncosmitty]

Numbers are the numbers man. Green Bay runs it just fine regardless of who is back there. They simply choose to throw it more. If I had Rodgers I'd do the same

You're nuts.

 

[sonnyblack65]

I see all the guys with more yards also have more picks and less TDs.

I highlighted Ryan and Rodgers to show their no#s that was the only comparison, the other guys don't matter


Matt Ryan ATL QB 373 534 69.9 33.4 4,944 9.3 309.0 38 7 238 44.6 76T 69 17 37 117.1

Aaron Rodgers QB 374 571 65.5 38.1 4,128 7.2 275.2 36 7 205 35.9 66T 53 10 34 102.7

 

[mr.hockey4242]

He wouldn't be 4-6 on the Packers. He would have beat the Colts and Titans just like he actually did this year you fucking idiot. Rodgers didn't beat them. He might have beat the Cowboys too in a game where Rodgers was complete shit.

Wait, because the Raiders beat the Colts

It means Carr would have with the Packers

Even tho Rodgers was clearly superior this year?

You do realize that Carr beat the colts outside that 10 game window right? More cherry picking?

Do you even know which way is left?