- Thread starter
- #461
yep, make a wrong decision on a BIG free agent, and it sets you back a few years. but when you don't have a very good QB.........
Yeah, when they didn't have a very good QB, they had to go to a big free agent since they didn't draft one and wasn't guaranteed to have a shot at one. I don't know how bad they are at drafting but even that takes a long time. If our QB pans out, Nolan would feel the QB he picked didn't ripen in time. So Nolan would have wanted to get that big free agent because his pick wouldn't get better before he left. (Note: this is with Nolan not knowing how bad he was with QBs.)
I understand the urgency. I don't know why, other than they could have cut him anytime, to sign him immediately upon trading for him, for so much. Giving up a lot of draft picks showed the lockerroom they believed in him. I know they needed to sign him so that it wasn't a bunch of draft picks for one year rental. Kolb had the leverage and the potential. I wonder how this changes things for future big free agents or whether it'll be the same. You'll always have the unknown and players with leverage when dealing with big trades.
I haven't watched the game, but given that I assume the Cardinals want to start Kolb, I think today's 9-12, 95 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT game will be enough for them to exaggerate to the point of justification for starting Kolb. Don't know though, or course.
Ha......I was just coming on here to say how bad he looked tonight. Granted he did put it together a bit toward the end, but a huge chunk of his numbers came off a broken play where Fitz was open by 30 yards and Kolb underthrew him by 20. The INT was really bad and he generally looked rough. Cardinals look like they could even be worse than the Rams.