- Thread starter
- #1
nddulac
Doh! mer
I'm not offended. Unfortunately, you have gotten a lot of facts incorrect in your attempt to show me how little I understand. I'm not offended because I my expectations of your reasoning skills are rather low. But lets examine your claims a little bit.No offense, but you know/understand very little about these things.
First, no one has ever been slapped with "lack of institutional control" without first committing infractions. Second, Ohio State was not slapped with "Lack of Institutional control" (although I believe they should have been.) Further, with the NCAA penalties would (and did, with the exception of Terrelle Pryor who jumped to the NFL) be held out for games in the subsequent year. The biggest penalty handed down in that case was a "Show Cause" penalty on Jim Tressel. That means that if Ohio State (or anyone else) wanted to hire him to work in an NCAA sanctioned sport or department, the hiring institution would have to "show cause" as to why they should get a waiver to be allowed to hire him.Infractions are not what leads to such things. Lack of institutional control is what does. Remember Ohio St and Prior? Did Ohio St forfeit games because of that? No, they even delays the punishment until after the Bowl games so he could play. But when Ohio St/Tressel was found to have covered things up, they got nailed for lack of institutional control and then it hit.
USC chose to go the route of telling the NCAA to go screw themselves, by forcing the NCAA to prove the allegations against the program. Further, USC was employing fewer resources (one person in the compliance office) than most mid-majors (my only experience was San Jose State, who had several people working on compliance) despite the fact that mid-majors have considerably fewer resources to go around.USC got the same thing - lack of institutional control.
Incidentally, USC has a second comeuppance in the pipeline that will be very interesting to watch unfold, given the severity of the sanctions levied under the Reggie Bush case. While the Reggie bush case was being pursued, Joe McKnight was found to be driving an SUV that was registered to Scott Schenter, the employer of Joe McKnight's girlfriend. USC investigated the situation, found that Schenter had bought the SUV for McKnight's girlfriend, and that no infractions had occurred. It has since come to light that Scott Schenter bought and insured another car for Joe McNight, which McNight totaled. Schenter also bought plane tickets for McKnight. These are things the USC investigation clearly failed to uncover. Also, this happened while the eyes of the entire college athletics universe were affixed to USC because of the Reggie Bush/OJ Mayo investigations. But that is a story that remains to play out.
The evidence has already shown that the infractions were orchestrated by a former Alabama player, invoved players at two other schools, and were sufficient to disqualify one player at Tennessee for most of last season. Keep in mind the NCAA's reluctance to disqualify Cam Newton, but their decisive move on Maurice Couch seems to indicate that the believe the allegations have significant legs.Alabama got the same thing back over Albert Means, they nailed us hard as well. Back in the 90's with Antonio Langham we got nailed decently hard for that because Gene Stallings/Alabama refused to cooperate with the NCAA.
So unless there is some evidence out there that shows Alabama had a lack of institutional control in the matter, not going to happen. And since the people who did the investigation for/at Yahoo refuse to turnover any evidence to the NCAA, that's not going to be any easier.
Okay.Sorry, you'll have to find a moral victory in something else.