SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
not so hot here
SF picks up where they left off and brings LA back to reality.
Delusional, eh?Anyone that dismisses a team from playoff contention with Rodgers under center either hasn't been watching football in the past decade or is delusional
I perfer this actual reality over that
Garropolo got hurt and LA added players! Different scenario if neither of those happened.
Even if Jimmy G didn't get hurt, so you think they could of competed for the NFC West. Nope, the Rams were and are better.
wtf are you talking about mr paranoid. i bumped a prediction thread late in the season. havent actually commented on a single one of the predictions. How is that trying to run you off? do tell.They would not have won the division, but they would have competed. Two things you have to account for. The rams free agency and Patrick Maholmes. SF lost close games to LAC, GB, Arizona the second time, NYG. They actually was in it with LA week 7 before SF's offense could not do anything and LA wore them out. SF would be 6-4 at this point with a healthy Garropolo. They would have beaten LAC, GB/LAR/NYG, Oakland, and swept Arizona. And they would split with Seattle, beat this TB team they are close with as it is, and beat Denver. It's debatable if they would beat Chicago. They would be 9-7 or 10-6.
My blog had LAR btw winning the division, having the top seed, and making the SB. It's SP deciding to use something against me here to run me off, but it's not working.
ok bud. how long have you been on this board? EVERYONE BUMPS PREDICTION THREADS, all kinds of them.........by anyone and everyone........Why would you bump predictions that I have revised since? Paranoid, no I just see right through you.
I love how you state this as fact. You're out there dude, but you are consistent. I'll give you that.They would not have won the division, but they would have competed. Two things you have to account for. The rams free agency and Patrick Maholmes. SF lost close games to LAC, GB, Arizona the second time, NYG. They actually was in it with LA week 7 before SF's offense could not do anything and LA wore them out. SF would be 6-4 at this point with a healthy Garropolo. They would have beaten LAC, GB/LAR/NYG, Oakland, and swept Arizona. And they would split with Seattle, beat this TB team they are close with as it is, and beat Denver. It's debatable if they would beat Chicago. They would be 9-7 or 10-6.
My blog had LAR btw winning the division, having the top seed, and making the SB. It's SP deciding to use something against me here to run me off, but it's not working.
It’s always great when the packers suck. Hopefully it lasts more than a year now.Nice that you show up now.![]()
I love how you state this as fact. You're out there dude, but you are consistent. I'll give you that.
I think they were solidly the third place team in the NFC West with Jimmy G. They beat the Lions and played the Vikings and Chiefs fairly tough in losses. 6-8 wins sounds about right.i don't think the Niners were a play-off contender even with Jimmy G under center. He was a great story last year and he might be good down the road but we don't know anything yet. I like what the Niners have done in their rebuild despite this Foster craziness but they are very young, still make a lot of mistakes and are still a little way off from overtaking the Seahawks in that division. Let's give them a little time to grow and see what they actually are. I thought they might win 6-8 games this year with Jimmy. Now I think they are a little behind in the rebuild. It's baby steps for now but I like the way they compete at times.