jta4437
Grumpy Cat
You want some facts? How about these awesome numbers. 76 wRC+, .674 OPS, .285 OBP, .389 SLG, 0.6 fWAR.
Yeah he's not hurting this team.
-.4 oWAR
Unlike Young, Murphy's defense is actually helping is oWAR
You want some facts? How about these awesome numbers. 76 wRC+, .674 OPS, .285 OBP, .389 SLG, 0.6 fWAR.
Yeah he's not hurting this team.
Can we stop the Murphy argument? It's a waste of time and the right answer is obvious to most. You're entitled to your opinion in a forum, yea? Good stuff, moving on.
and i'm happy that Murphy is not a long term part of the franchise but use the prospects to get a starting pitcher now and replace Murphy in the off-season
Thats unfortunate if thats your observation, I had anything but a negative response to that reply. I just disagreed with you man, nothing more nothing less.Same goes for you pal, I take far more from the "tone" of your post than you putting a little "lol" in there
I take disagreement and criticism just fine as long as its rational and makes sense, scotsman tends to do neither
Thats unfortunate if thats your observation, I had anything but a negative response to that reply. I just disagreed with you man, nothing more nothing less.
wow, you're a baby.You can stop the Murphy argument, I find it worth debating, if you feel like your time is being wasted then please move on like you said
lol
wow, you're a baby.
wow, you're a baby.
He's just telling you you're welcome to excuse yourself from the discussion. We have a right to continue it without you if you don't want to participate.
Baseball was better with PED's. Now a days if you have a good season people accuse you of juicing. You'll never get rid of them and players will always find loop holes.
It's like college football. If they were paid we wouldn't have all the secret cheating going on.
I don't exactly think baseball should allow PED's, but this stuff is just getting annoying.
No it's because you sir, are being emotional, in your worlds "snarky", while also claiming you can read emotion telepathically. I was discussing, and you want to overanalyze my comment by saying "lol" is emotional. All I'm saying is the Murphy answer seems obvious.I think its because I threw the lol in at the end to be snarky
Why can't we do both if it doesn't mortgage our future and improves our chances for the playoffs.
I would just rather get a pitcher and wait to the off-season because I think that course would still improve our chances without stripping our farm system. to get a major upgrade on Murphy and that's what we have to do to make it worthwhile and to also bring a good arm would tax our system. not worth it.
make the move on an arm now and then rebuild the outfield in the off-season.
No it's because you sir, are being emotional, in your worlds "snarky", while also claiming you can read emotion telepathically. I was discussing, and you want to overanalyze my comment by saying "lol" is emotional. All I'm saying is the Murphy answer seems obvious.
I'm not understanding your thought process. Rios or Garza would not deplete the farm system. I agree an arm is the most important, but we have an overabundance of assets that could be utilized to make us better in both areas.I would just rather get a pitcher and wait to the off-season because I think that course would still improve our chances without stripping our farm system. to get a major upgrade on Murphy and that's what we have to do to make it worthwhile and to also bring a good arm would tax our system. not worth it.
make the move on an arm now and then rebuild the outfield in the off-season.
I'm not understanding your thought process. Rios or Garza would deplete the farm system. I agree an arm is the most important, but we have an overabundance of assets that could be utilized to make us better in both areas.
I'm not talking about stripping our farm system. Are you learning disabled? We wouldn't strip our farm to acquire a pitcher and a guy like rios. We need to improve Murphy's position. Period.
Whatever you say man, I wasn't irritated, just disagreed with you, and I was obviously being sarcastic with the telepathic comment. I'm over it, moving on.I never said "lol" was emotional, I just tend to ignore its use b/c its overused
I'm not being emotional at all, but sarcasm doesn't have to be an emotional response
Did I say I could read emotion "telepathically" if I did I apologize b/c I can by no means do so
All I do is base emotional response by the tone of the message, if I'm wrong so be it, but I'm right more often than not though
so what would it cost to get Rios? and then which pitcher do we go after? i'm interested in your thought process on this