- Thread starter
- #21
This is about how police treat minorities.
no it isn't. it's about how police treat thugs who appear to have guns and don't cooperate
Do you actually think cops are goin around sayin "gee i wonder where I can find a black guy to kill today"
Do you really think they were all thugs and do you really think killing people is an appropriate way to "treat" those who don't cooperate?
last I checked, resisting arrest was a misdemeanor, not punishable by death.
What's an officer supposed to do if he believes you're pulling a gun on him and tells you stop and you don't stop? wait to get shot?
Stop hyper escalating situations to the point where it comes to that.
Video shows police killing unarmed black man in Tulsa
He was charged with 1st degree manslaughter
This is about how police treat minorities.
If an officer feels his life is being threatened? Unfortunate, but yes.
Is that always what happens in these shootings? No.
Does something need to change? Sure.
Does rioting, looting, and showing your rear end to the country help? Definitely not.
What do we do? Let's have a dialogue
They knew what was in his car. They had already searched it. ANd again disobeying a police officer is not a capital crime. And regardless of all the if's, his children do not have a father today because a cop shot an unarmed man for disregarding and instruction even though he had his hands in the air and was approaching a vehicle that had already been cleared of the possiblity of any weapons. The attitude that if they just do what their told they won't get shot has to be debunked. That was the first thing the officer said, therefore that was the officer's justification. That is the problem.Again, specific to this instance, there is blame to go around. I'm fairly confident in saying that the officers were not ordering him to walk away from them and back towards his car where they have no idea what is in his car or what his intentions are. Had he followed orders and gotten on the ground like he was most likely told to do, there's a fairly good chance this man would still be alive.
Having said that, I also believe that simply using a stun gun (which they did use) would have been effective enough in taking this man into custody and he'd still be alive today and his kids would still have a father.
Why are we isolating 5-10 events where an officer was CLEARLY in the wrong and making it out to be an epidemic, sensationalizing everything and so on
Because when the media gets ahold of those events they explode and spread like wild fire making it seem like it's been thousands.
Oh my bad, 5 -10 innocent people killed. I was thinking that was a problem. My bad.Why are we isolating 5-10 events where an officer was CLEARLY in the wrong and making it out to be an epidemic, sensationalizing everything and so on
Oh my bad, 5 -10 innocent people killed. I was thinking that was a problem. My bad.