obxyankeefan
Well-Known Member
Brady is going to have to have another career year.
Pats even looked bad in Zone coverage. They're gonna give up a ton of points.
And now my Suicide team looks even worse
Brady is going to have to have another career year.
Pats even looked bad in Zone coverage. They're gonna give up a ton of points.
I can't see those rosters.And now my Suicide team looks even worse
I can't see those rosters.
Spencer Ware?At least there is one person that cannot see one of my worst drafts ever. I screwed it up bad.
I dunno.. he didn't look all that great to me. Those deep balls weren't getting it done, even before it got out of hand. He might have to throw plenty if the D is gonna be like that. . not so sure it'll translate into career year type successBrady is going to have to have another career year.
Pats even looked bad in Zone coverage. They're gonna give up a ton of points.
He'll have to better than tonight. A lot better. (Couple times he had like ten seconds in the pocket. And didn't hit a receiver.)I dunno.. he didn't look all that great to me. Those deep balls weren't getting it done, even before it got out of hand. He might have to throw plenty if the D is gonna be like that. . not so sure it'll translate into career year type success
What sucks is the Chiefs have a whopping 5 in ours, while the Pats got "only" negative 1. I would say is pretty obvious the Chiefs D played much better than only 6 points above the PatsThe Pats D actually had 5 positive points on ESPN (I have them in suicide), but Milk has them in Dynasty 1 and they got him a nice -10. Nothing like having the Patriots defense and Travis Kelce going and having -6 after the game. OUCH!!
They were a negative until Houston got those sacks.What sucks is the Chiefs have a whopping 5 in ours, while the Pats got "only" negative 1. I would say is pretty obvious the Chiefs D played much better than only 6 points above the Pats
Well don't get me wrong, they deserve their 5, nothing more. It's the other which should be a helluvalot lessThey were a negative until Houston got those sacks.
those 3 td say differentlyHammer? He appears to have the short yardage role, but he's no hammer...perhaps a tack hammer?
Guess you didn't actually see either of them? There was no hammering required. Must've missed those 2 stuffs on 4th downs too.. those did require a hammerthose 3 td say differently
For one game. .. that they lost.whelp looks like i was right on gilly being the hammer
hey if he fills the blount role i don't care what they do.For one game. .. that they lost.