Chef99
It's raw, you donkey!
I'm actually more worried about this:
Dose: Cooks Wants the Ball - Rotoworld.com
I think there will be enough wealth to share in that game, just gotta see if the squeaky wheel gets greased.
I'm actually more worried about this:
Dose: Cooks Wants the Ball - Rotoworld.com
rule change suggestion for future season...
when playoff season comes, we can also add a a toilet bowl to more fairly decide who gets demoted or sent into oblivion... Plus it would be fun to EARN your spot back...
I'm not sure how that would work since two teams move down.
Just like the regular playoffs. The last 4 teams compete in a playoff. The winner is saved.
Doesn't really change how we decide to demote teams. It just allows a team to earn its right back into the league.
Think TKO said it best:Lefty, Fuzzy, Milk, Joe, Face and Ram have all been eliminated because they can't catch their division leaders or Steelers for the wild card.
Is it me or are Fuzzy and Joe the best looking 4-8 teams in fantasy football history. The schedule makers have not been kind to you guys.
And that includes both leagues.your roster is 4-8... most points against, congrats!
Yeah.... it would have to be a situation where ties are involved...
Considering our #1 requirement, being active, both in the league and in the boards, I'd wholeheartedly agreeI'd like to think that level of participation should play into any ties. ..... just saying.
Ha. I have more points this year than last.Comparison to last year. Some interesting things. Tlance almost has an identical breakdown record this year and is 6-6 compared to 10-2 last year, which is very interesting because with that breakdown record, if all things were equal he should be 8-4.
If this was last year, Barilko's 95-37 record would have given him a 7 game breakdown lead over Face for the best record who was 87-41-4 after week 12. But this year he's 9.5 games back of OBX!!
Just like the regular playoffs. The last 4 teams compete in a playoff. The winner is saved.
Doesn't really change how we decide to demote teams. It just allows a team to earn its right back into the league.
Just like the regular playoffs. The last 4 teams compete in a playoff. The winner is saved.
Doesn't really change how we decide to demote teams. It just allows a team to earn its right back into the league.
Yeah.... it would have to be a situation where ties are involved...
Ok, so using this logic, let's say we play 14 regular season weeks and someone finishes last in the standings, last in points, and last in breakdown. Why in the hell should they get a chance to redeem themselves with two lucky weeks if they had 14 weeks to prove themselves in the first place? If we just used record as a determination for moving people down i would agree with that because as you can see by Joe and Fuzzy's records, their teams are much better than their records indicate, but that is the whole reason that we use points and breakdown as a determination too. If we just used record, Fuzzy and Joe would be in the bottom 3 this year, but since we use those other factors as well, neither one of them is in any danger of being relegated.
That's the reason that it's the regular season breakdown champ that is the only guaranteed ticket to the A league from the B league. Wil and the founding fathers knew that the playoffs are a crap shoot in which not necessarily the best team wins the championship, so instead of just rewarding the Super Bowl champ, we also reward the team that was the best for the entire season, not just a mini tournament at the end of the year. It truly is a brilliant way to do things in a league like this since both the best team in the playoffs (Super Bowl Champ) and the best team for the course of the entire season (breakdown champ) get rewarded.
If anything, in the A league I would be more for the bottom person moving down always and the next two people playing each other to see who the 2nd team to go down should be, because that essentially is exactly what we do to decide who should move up in the B league. Those two teams could play each other in week 16 to coincide with the Super Bowl. In the B league, I'm not so sure about oblivion anyway. The oblivion was not really set up for performing poorly in the standings, it was more for if somebody performed poorly, didn't post anything, and didn't care about their team anymore so I don't really think it's relevant to this discussion as they will be dealt with regardless of if they won a game in week 16. It's not like finishing last guarantees that you will kicked out of the league. If that was the case I could see that being relevant, but since it's not, I don't see what the point would be.
It's not like finishing last guarantees that you will kicked out of the league. If that was the case I could see that being relevant, but since it's not, I don't see what the point would be.
oh chefGonna hold off for a bit. Just can't decide.
Ok, so using this logic, let's say we play 14 regular season weeks and someone finishes last in the standings, last in points, and last in breakdown. Why in the hell should they get a chance to redeem themselves with two lucky weeks if they had 14 weeks to prove themselves in the first place? If we just used record as a determination for moving people down i would agree with that because as you can see by Joe and Fuzzy's records, their teams are much better than their records indicate, but that is the whole reason that we use points and breakdown as a determination too. If we just used record, Fuzzy and Joe would be in the bottom 3 this year, but since we use those other factors as well, neither one of them is in any danger of being relegated.
That's the reason that it's the regular season breakdown champ that is the only guaranteed ticket to the A league from the B league. Wil and the founding fathers knew that the playoffs are a crap shoot in which not necessarily the best team wins the championship, so instead of just rewarding the Super Bowl champ, we also reward the team that was the best for the entire season, not just a mini tournament at the end of the year. It truly is a brilliant way to do things in a league like this since both the best team in the playoffs (Super Bowl Champ) and the best team for the course of the entire season (breakdown champ) get rewarded.
If anything, in the A league I would be more for the bottom person moving down always and the next two people playing each other to see who the 2nd team to go down should be, because that essentially is exactly what we do to decide who should move up in the B league. Those two teams could play each other in week 16 to coincide with the Super Bowl. In the B league, I'm not so sure about oblivion anyway. The oblivion was not really set up for performing poorly in the standings, it was more for if somebody performed poorly, didn't post anything, and didn't care about their team anymore so I don't really think it's relevant to this discussion as they will be dealt with regardless of if they won a game in week 16. It's not like finishing last guarantees that you will kicked out of the league. If that was the case I could see that being relevant, but since it's not, I don't see what the point would be.