shopson67
Well-Known Member
Bosa's predicted fit is at 4-3 DE. It's a fit issue that makes him drop to 6.
Dak Prescott seems a bit low but we are talking about guys who are projecting like Gabbert and Tebow so the odds of hitting a starting QB out of prospects like Prescott and Hackenberg are probably 25-30% at best.Not a bad spread sheet by any means. I mean I can't come up with that many names so kudos to this guy for doing it. Obviously every one of us will have things we disagree with on the list. Such as for me Hackenberg and Cook are nowhere near #3 and 4 for the QB position in my book. They both have some major red flags to their game that to me are just too big to overcome. I would have Paxton Lynch and Dak Prescott over both of those guys.
Dak Prescott seems a bit low but we are talking about guys who are projecting like Gabbert and Tebow so the odds of hitting a starting QB out of prospects like Prescott and Hackenberg are probably 25-30% at best.
I feel like whoever you put under Brandon Allen in a list is basically QBs you think are career backups because thats almost certainly who Brandon Allen is. A quality career backup.
A have a lot of discrepancies but it is a good list. Vernon Butler being the top NT is the one that jumps out at me because I figured he was perfect fit as a 4-3 DT but I could see him being a monster at the NT spot, too.
I wouldn't touch Carl Nassib with a 10 ft pole. I think he is being overrated here.
I think Aaron Burbridge is too low. A pedestrian athlete, sure, but a #2 WR that could be in the league for awhile.
I think Jaylon Smith could play any linebacker position he wants except 3-4 rush lb. I think picking him in the first round to be a 4-3 OLB is probably a bit of a waste.
Kenneth Dixon as the 7th RB is interesting. Mackenzie Alexander as #2 CB is interesting, too. Very polarizing prospects.
Damn, you backed down quick on that one...Fair enough, obviously I have some homer in me… I think he has potential to become a star, but is more likely to have the type of career you predict.
I agree. Elliot is almost certainly going to be a good NFL player but he is just a running back. Mark Ingram is a good NFL player and hasn't helped his team win squat.RB to me seems like the hardest group to grade. Like I said so many of the guys it all depends what system they go to. I think Elliot is the type that can do well in about any system but any more it really does seem more about system fit than about overall talent at that position. It is why we are seeing so many late round guys thrive because coaches are scouting for a certain style of runner.
Bosa's predicted fit is at 4-3 DE. It's a fit issue that makes him drop to 6.
I think Bosa might end up being my 3rd highest rated pass rusher by the time this is done but I haven't really broken into all of the other players college 'film' yet. I'm also really curious to see Bosa's combine measurements and numbers. The big thing with JJ Watt, Von Miller, Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald is that their combine suggested that they were something really special. You really need to show explosiveness at the combine to be selected as the top pass rusher imo.
I agree. Elliot is almost certainly going to be a good NFL player but he is just a running back. Mark Ingram is a good NFL player and hasn't helped his team win squat.
Gurley probably won 2 games or so for the Rams last year and he broke off big runs. Big runs may or may not be sustainable.
Running back is important but there are so many good teams who just run a committee.
Wow, I can't possible disagree with this more. If an NFL team with all of their scouts judges a player based more on his combine than his play on the field they deserve to get burnt. Yeah, some future stars do real well at teh combine, but so did Vernon Gholston...Combine is for the interviews, the medical exams, the Kipers and the fans to watch these guys run...real scouts watch the game film
Sure, but all those guys mentioned were all hugely productive at the college level. It's not like these guys were all hype and no substance. The combine just helped show that they can adjust to the speed/intensity of the next level. These guys have to pass the eye test too. None of these aspects (film, interviews, combine, background) should be left out. You need to get these kids accurately measured and compared physically to their peers.
There have been some guys drafted almost purely on their combine though in my opinion. I mean look at DHB drafted by the Raiders. His best season in college he had 786 yards. He only had 15 total touchdowns in 3 years of starting. Yet here he was taking top-10.
How did he turn out? Point is the scouts know who is fast, strong, short, tall, strong arm, etc. The combine does nothing other than help them make their decision. No one (IMO of course) is ever drafted early solely on their combine. Some guys surprise or disappoint and change their draft status, but it is not nearly as important as the game film. The game film isn't always extensive or impressive. You don't need a scout to look at stats. You need a scout to watch a guy that only has 786 yards and watch every play to see if it was lack of opportunity or lack of talent.There have been some guys drafted almost purely on their combine though in my opinion. I mean look at DHB drafted by the Raiders. His best season in college he had 786 yards. He only had 15 total touchdowns in 3 years of starting. Yet here he was taking top-10.
The adage is that the combine confirms what you've seen on film.How did he turn out? Point is the scouts know who is fast, strong, short, tall, strong arm, etc. The combine does nothing other than help them make their decision. No one (IMO of course) is ever drafted early solely on their combine. Some guys surprise or disappoint and change their draft status, but it is not nearly as important as the game film. The game film isn't always extensive or impressive. You don't need a scout to look at stats. You need a scout to watch a guy that only has 786 yards and watch every play to see if it was lack of opportunity or lack of talent.
In Kiper's latest mock draft he had Bosa going #6 overall
Sure, the guy you think is #1 overall will fall to 6, as 2 teams draft other defensive personnel ahead of him. Makes sense.
Personally, I kinda want the Browns to take Bosa at #2 overall and worry about a QB later on. None of the current crop wows me much.
Damn, you backed down quick on that one...
Don't...idk what DEF Hue has hired, but with the big NT already in place it makes sense to stay 3-4...if so, Bosa may not be your guy...maybe he can play DE at 285-290 but that would be an big unknown to take a player so high.
These QBs might take a yr or two down the road, but the upside on the top 2 guys is better than anything the Browns have had talent wise in a long time...CLE gets 2 & 32...really two 1st rounders...not a bad strategy if Bosa was a good fit. Idk if he's good enough to revamp a scheme around.
The combine absolutely is overrated IMO. I've read where many teams only place significant value on the interviews and the medical evaluations.The adage is that the combine confirms what you've seen on film.
People dissing the combine for rising players though are missing the bigger picture. The combine isnt overrated but every position has a floor.
You used Vernon Gholston as an example. He was overrated because of his college career and Sr Bowl, too. The other pass rushers in that draft were kinda bad, too.
The two things that are overrated are 40 time and bench press.