Because Sasaki wouldn't go against their set payroll. He has to be paid with international money which comes out of a different budget. They either spend it on him or 3 16-year-old Latin players. That is why he in particular is the key. Much like Ohtani when he came over. That is why M's went for it on him and then got burned by the freaking Angels.But why? Sasaki would instantly be the Ace, at least by performance and stuff but another top starter isn’t what they need, especially one with a AA pitch count. Not saying I don’t want them to sign him at all cause I think switching him and Castillo does make the team better. But I also think Hancock or the other two rookies plus 2 bats is better than Castillo and prayers. But I would love for them to trade Castillo and sign him.
I’m not saying Castillo doesn’t have value. Just saying in terms of getting an impact bat I personally think he has the least value of any of the starters. IMO, in order for someone to take on his entire salary the M’s will have to toss in a prospect.
I totally understand wanting Sasaki and his salary. I’m just saying trading Castillo IMO isn’t related to signing Sasaki. In my dream world, if they sign Sasaki that would mean Gilbert or Kirby is now tradable.Because Sasaki wouldn't go against their set payroll. He has to be paid with international money which comes out of a different budget. They either spend it on him or 3 16-year-old Latin players. That is why he in particular is the key. Much like Ohtani when he came over. That is why M's went for it on him and then got burned by the freaking Angels.
Castillo has value I guarantee it. There are actual teams out there that are not afraid to pay market value. He is easily market value. He is not a vet where we have to attach a prospect in order to trade him. We have to add one to up a deal for a multi-player trade.
It should be fun...or boring like most offseasons for M's.
But my rebuttals to what pitchers are signing for is teams don’t have to give up anything to get a FA. Which goes back to us hating ownership cause they’d rather give up something to get a player rather than sign someone. Sign a Walker or Bregman so you don’t have to subtract from the MLB nor give up your top prospects to trade for someone else’s leftovers.Any trade of a SP has to be predicated on them signing Sasaki.
Castillo has good value. Workhorse with history. His salary seems bad to us because we are the cheap ass Mariners, but the going rate for free agent starters is crazy. Just look at the last 3 signings. Nobody's making almost as much.
Castillo is the only one that gives them spending money and he is the least valuable to us IMO.I totally understand wanting Sasaki and his salary. I’m just saying trading Castillo IMO isn’t related to signing Sasaki. In my dream world, if they sign Sasaki that would mean Gilbert or Kirby is now tradable.
Castillo without question has value. But the main issue with him is the contract. The only teams who would take that on are going to be teams wanting to win. So not only would the Mariners be asking them to take on the contract but also give up an impact player. Thats where it’s hard to tell what the value is. Castillo for Bohm straight up I think would be the Phillies robbing the Mariners, but IMO that is what it’s going to be (a player a team doesn’t really want) unless the Mariners eat some of the deal. Also IMO if they are going to trade one of their starters it needs to be for a player that a contending team wants. Not like another Ray for Haniger deal where the Mariners give up something valuable for another teams scraps.
But that isn't Mariners reality.But my rebuttals to what pitchers are signing for is teams don’t have to give up anything to get a FA. Which goes back to us hating ownership cause they’d rather give up something to get a player rather than sign someone. Sign a Walker or Bregman so you don’t have to subtract from the MLB nor give up your top prospects to trade for someone else’s leftovers.
IMO front loading it isn’t for trade purposes. It for in year 3 or 4 the team can just release him and eat $4m of whatever. I truly think the back end of the contract is what is scaring ownership off of signing or extending players. Doing the opposite of deferring money is a way to appease ownership and attract FA’s IMO. Basically do a NFL model of front loading, with signing bonus’, and incentives. Another way of putting it is let the players brag about their contract like Julio can even though half of the actual contract is based off of incentives.Front loading is a good idea if we get him on a 4yr contract. If for whatever reason year 3 or 4 we're out of playoff contention early and he's putting up solid numbers, that becomes a very tradable contract to get top prospects in return.
For sure he does. But like how you said trading him is predicated on signing Sasaki, do you think trading Castillo is also predicated on signing Walker or Bregman?Castillo is the only one that gives them spending money and he is the least valuable to us IMO.