- Thread starter
- #81
averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
But T-man had him in 2002. Just wondering what's your point?
I don't remember?
Oh wait... I think it had to do with someone suggesting that when Trestman was an OC, his offenses tailed off statistically. So I brought up that Trestman at least got the most out of the offensive talent that he had to work with - which is how Charlie Garner came up.
Garner was in Oakland in 2002 (yes, I did get the year wrong), but he was 29 at the time (the age I got right), which is near the end of Garner's career.
Nice catch on the year.