- Thread starter
- #1
Caliskinsfan
Burgundy & Gold Forevah
jiminy crickets...
I’m not sure your point?if i am correct every coach is vaxxed , just like cornell university and the 900 students who caught it as well not good
the vaccines arent what they were advertised to be and hence the different standards for both kinds of players arent about player safety or scienceI’m not sure your point?
the vaccines arent what they were advertised to be and hence the different standards for both kinds of players arent about player safety or science
i am 10000% sure that all the experts told me if i got vaxxed i was covered . and a simple look at the data says that isnt true . there are videos of thisthis is EVERY day btw
what were they advertised to be? Seems to me they are working. Are hospitalizations way down on the vaccinated? Are deaths way down on the vaccinated? The answer to both of those questions is yes, by a huge margin. now are the chances for breakthrough infections greater than what they thought? yes they are. But they absolutely have had a positive affect in the areas I mentioned above.the vaccines arent what they were advertised to be and hence the different standards for both kinds of players arent about player safety or science
Dad, you keep talking about player safety.....this isn't just about player safety, this is about community safety.what were they advertised to be? Seems to me they are working. Are hospitalizations way down on the vaccinated? Are deaths way down on the vaccinated? The answer to both of those questions is yes, by a huge margin. now are the chances for breakthrough infections greater than what they thought? yes they are. But they absolutely have had a positive affect in the areas I mentioned above.
i guess i will have to go back to the PM's but they were advertised to prevent catching AND spreading of covid .what were they advertised to be? Seems to me they are working. Are hospitalizations way down on the vaccinated? Are deaths way down on the vaccinated? The answer to both of those questions is yes, by a huge margin. now are the chances for breakthrough infections greater than what they thought? yes they are. But they absolutely have had a positive affect in the areas I mentioned above.
a look at the numbers you gave me above are as follows
0.00007 % of dying for unvaxxed
0.000006 % of dying if vaxxed
0.0000001 % if boostered
astronomical on all fronts
BS you allow a stadium full of people in the stadium vaxxed and unvaxxed and 320 mil ( low number ) divided into 900000, high number gives you a 0.002812 % of dying , astronomicalDad, you keep talking about player safety.....this isn't just about player safety, this is about community safety.
like i said a million times you are wrong STFULike I said a million times before: you’re wrong, nobody cares, so stfu.
depends on if death and hospitalizations are important to you or not. Again the different standards have less to do with player safety and more to do with community safety. i.e., lets keep people out of the hospital and not overwhelm our heath care system. I won't argue the mandate portion because I disagree with government mandates on what do to with my body... but however, private industry can mandate what ever they want, and I can decide if I want to either visit their place of business or work for them. My choice.i guess i will have to go back to the PM's but they were advertised to prevent catching AND spreading of covid .
the debate isnt about whether they work or not its about different standards for vaxxed and unvaxxed players and decisions based on bad information or misleading information
as i mentioned above with the numbers the data says there is no real difference in outcomes