MHSL82
Well-Known Member
are we saying sign him for 5 years at $10-12M for this purpose?
No, no, no... and no. I meant from Seattle's perspective, it could help strap some wouldn't-have-spent money - even if it's a compromise at four years, 32 million or whatever. It couldn't hurt Seattle because they'd have a better QB than what they have (assuming they can't get Manning). From Alex's perspective, he'd either have more security or better team. From our perspective, we could balk at it or we could up our offer a little bit (i.e. negotiation, this wasn't their ceiling per se). We wouldn't have to go the whole way and we shouldn't. But it would possibly create more money signed up to a rival, from the Hawk's perspective. Portland Trailblazers did this to the Utah Jazz with Paul Millsap. Offered him too much, Jazz matched it and had less to use. We are a little different because we don't have to match.