Game Thread: Commanders vs Cowboys: "Wind me up!"

[skinsdad62]

i think most understand noah isnt a number 2 , but alas there isnt a replacement to be had at reasonable cost

 

[PDay8810]

i think most understand noah isnt a number 2 , but alas there isnt a replacement to be had at reasonable cost

not so much here three weeks ago but it is becoming clearer now.
solid roster guy

 

[Stymietee]

Flattening routes I agree. Catching the damn ball is fundamentals I would say.

And Noah Brown is not a number two.

Being fundamentally unsound, e.g. dropping passes leads to poor execution of a play as it cannot be carried out as drawn up. The line blocks, the QB makes the throw and the receiver drops the ball. Any one or more aspects of the play that fails means poor execution of the play. This is why there's practice!
Btw; I agree, Noah is a WR3. What they lack is a WR1, TM is the WR2.

 

[Sportster 72]

I think he is right while at the same time I think he is making excuses for Daniels. Most were giving Daniels all the credit in the first half of the year and now it is someone else's fault. Too many fans had him in the HOF in his run through bad teams in the first half of the season. Today they should have kicked the crap out of Dallas and they fell way short again. Why did McLaurin have 20-30 yards until the Dallas mistake late in the game? To be sure the OLine isn't helping either but I saw this same thing 12 years ago with Griffin. I think Daniels is better that Griffin was but his level play needs to rise over the past few weeks.

I agree they need another WR, I agree then need OLine help. Why has McLaurin been shut down the last two weeks except for that last minute play?

 

[gkekoa]

i think most understand noah isnt a number 2 , but alas there isnt a replacement to be had at reasonable cost

So you understand now? Just two days ago you stated he is more than a number 3, which means you thought he was a low end #2 at a minimum.

 

[gkekoa]

Being fundamentally unsound, e.g. dropping passes leads to poor execution of a play as it cannot be carried out as drawn up. The line blocks, the QB makes the throw and the receiver drops the ball. Any one or more aspects of the play that fails means poor execution of the play. This is why there's practice!
Btw; I agree, Noah is a WR3. What they lack is a WR1, TM is the WR2.

Semantics.

 

[Stymietee]

Semantics.

More succinctly expressed, factual and lacking emotional bias!

 

[skinsdad62]

So you understand now? Just two days ago you stated he is more than a number 3, which means you thought he was a low end #2 at a minimum.

i must have miswrote that i meant no more then a number 3 . i thought thats what i wrote

 

[DJ Fieri]

2 game losing streak. Went from possibly winning the East to now fighting for a WC by the end of the season.

 

[gkekoa]

i must have miswrote that i meant no more then a number 3 . i thought thats what i wrote

Post 5,940 on Commanders News thread.
“He has caused caught passes that led to victory over giants and bears . Now is he a great number 2 ? No . Is he more a 3-4 wr ? Yes”


You stated he was not a great number 2 but he was more than a 3. That means you stated he was a 2. At least you retracted that crap statement.

 

[skinsdad62]

Post 5,940 on Commanders News thread.
“He has caused caught passes that led to victory over giants and bears . Now is he a great number 2 ? No . Is he more a 3-4 wr ? Yes”


You stated he was not a great number 2 but he was more than a 3. That means you stated he was a 2. At least you retracted that crap statement.

is he more a 3-4 is the quote , answer yes that is what i said

 

[PDay8810]

Post 5,940 on Commanders News thread.
“He has caused caught passes that led to victory over giants and bears . Now is he a great number 2 ? No . Is he more a 3-4 wr ? Yes”


You stated he was not a great number 2 but he was more than a 3. That means you stated he was a 2. At least you retracted that crap statement.

you got him here.
Nice work from another thread and all.

BTW...you need to change one team from Minnesota to Atlanta.

 

[skinsdad62]

you got him here.
Nice work from another thread and all.

BTW...you need to change one team from Minnesota to Atlanta.

the phrase "more a " 3-4 wr should indicate what i see him as . MORE A again MORE A

 

[gkekoa]

is he more a 3-4 is the quote , answer yes that is what i said

Taken in a sentence alone, you may have a point; however, why not just say “he is a 3 or 4” and free the ambiguity?

When your previous sentence is, “is he a great #2,” that leads the receiver of your message to believe you are defending a stance that Noah Brown is a #2. The word more should have never been used unless you stated he was more of a 3. Poor QBing from you.

That being said, I can see it now. We are cool. But Brown sucks.

 

[skinsdad62]

Taken in a sentence alone, you may have a point; however, why not just say “he is a 3 or 4” and free the ambiguity?

When your previous sentence is, “is he a great #2,” that leads the receiver of your message to believe you are defending a stance that Noah Brown is a #2. The word more should have never been used unless you stated he was more of a 3. Poor QBing from you.

That being said, I can see it now. We are cool. But Brown sucks.

That’s what the question mark is for and the following “no” answer the answer that followed was No

 

[gkekoa]

That’s what the question mark is for and the following “no” answer the answer that followed was No

Except you did not ask if Noah was a #2. You asked if he was a great number 2.

 

[skinsdad62]

Except you did not ask if Noah was a #2. You asked if he was a great number 2.

Ok but the following statement, more like a 3-4 covers that

 

[gkekoa]

Ok but the following statement, more like a 3-4 covers that

Except you did not say that.

 

[skinsdad62]

Except you did not say that.

Why would I need to say it ? Saying he is more like a 3-4 completely takes out the need to mention “ great number 2 “. Which I said he wasn’t

 

[gkekoa]

Why would I need to say it ? Saying he is more like a 3-4 completely takes out the need to mention “ great number 2 “. Which I said he wasn’t

Not a great number two makes it sound like you believe he is a #2.

You also never stated he is a more like a 3-4. You may have thought you did but nobody took it as such. If nobody takes it as such, the communicator screwed up.