- Thread starter
- #141
lebron23james
Well-Known Member
Kobe wins rings better.
NEXT
So did bill russel it didn't make him better than jordan
Kobe wins rings better.
NEXT
Kobe didn't have Shaq in two of his five titles and If Lebron was a better clutch shot, he wouldn't have quit in so many games. Kobe also carried those teams several times when Shaq was out of the game due to injuries -You can compare year to year on basketball reference...look at kobes best vs lebrons best
Most important stats are win share, PER, fg%, PPS and defensive rating
Kobe had a prime shaq(better than any teammate lebron ever had)....Take that away and he has 2 rings just like lebron(with much worse stats in every category) and that is all he ever would have had...they both have 2 finals mvps...shaq won all 3 in LA
Lebron even has a better clutch last shot % lol
Kobe had a prime shaq(better than any teammate lebron ever had)....Take that away and he has 2 rings just like lebron(with much worse stats in every category) and that is all he ever would have had...they both have 2 finals mvps...shaq won all 3 in LA
Actually I think it did, but I won't go thereSo did bill russel it didn't make him better than jordan
But you can't take them away and without Kobe, Shaq doesn't have those 3 rings either. Meanwhile, Lebron is 2-4 in the finals and had stacked teams in 5 of those 6 finals appearances. That's a pretty pathetic record when you consider how he went to stacked teams.
Can any stupid kobe kid make a logical argument other than rings....Kobe is litteraly better at nothing in the game of basketball lol
Player Comparison Finder | Basketball-Reference.com
I could argue those spurs teams were more staked
We have. You are either unwilling or unable to comprehend them. This makes you either willfully stupid or just stupid. Either works.
Does he score more points, play better defense, rebound more get more assists, have a higher PER, higher fg%, higher win share?
Name it...
I've named it at least twice in this thread. If you missed it, I'd suggest going back and re-read.
Outside of rings a team accomplishment name 1 thing he does better individually at the game of basketball in any category...I'll wait
gotta give you this. when it's all said and done the one thing people are gonna remember after he hangs 'em up is this..."how many times did he win the big one...?"
not the fairest thing to judge a player on, but that's how the sports world works...
And you can take away much less of what Leboner had and he wins zero championships. The fact remains that Lebron's starts are slightly better in some areas, but not all of them. Stats do lie sometimes because they don't tell you a lot of things, like the times Kobe was forced to take the last shot no matter how bad it was and they say nothing about Lebron quitting so he would have better stats. The stats say nothing about Kobe drawing a triple team so that two players would be free to take the last shot. There are hundreds of those small things that Kobe did to take them to those five championships and they are the same things that Lebron didn't do which is the reason he won only twice and lost the other four. Some say it's unfair to judge a man by the rings, but it's the biggest stat that does not lie. Oh I forget though - you claim that's the only stat that does lie - there goes that Forest Gump logic againYou can compare year to year on basketball reference...look at kobes best vs lebrons best
Most important stats are win share, PER, fg%, PPS and defensive rating
Kobe had a prime shaq(better than any teammate lebron ever had)....Take that away and he has 2 rings just like lebron(with much worse stats in every category) and that is all he ever would have had...they both have 2 finals mvps...shaq won all 3 in LA
Lebron even has a better clutch last shot % lol
We've had this debate before, and Trojan pointed out the most correct point.
Nobody, years down the road will really look at opponent, injuries, etc..
They'll just look at the W-L.
While James shouldn't be faulted for all but 1 of the losses, it won't ever change the record book which will always show them.
Can any stupid kobe kid make a logical argument other than rings....Kobe is litteraly better at nothing in the game of basketball lol
Player Comparison Finder | Basketball-Reference.com
Maybe for the simple fan....but when looking at all time greats finals mvps will be very important, PPG, APG, RPG and PER
That will be the criteria
Rings being the last criteria....Otherwise you would have this guy Tom Heinsohn as an all time great top 5....i mean he won 8 championships
Is he in any of your top 5 greatest players?
As a matter of fact there Is one
Kobe - five championships
Lebron - Two championships
So there is your one stats sonny boy![]()
Maybe for the simple fan....but when looking at all time greats finals mvps will be very important, PPG, APG, RPG and PER
That will be the criteria
Rings being the last criteria....Otherwise you would have this guy Tom Heinsohn as an all time great top 5....i mean he won 8 championships
Is he in any of your top 5 greatest players?
This is where you fail to understand the nature of the game. Only the current matters in the heart of fans. People talk about Isaiah Thomas, Magic Johnson, Kareem, Jerry West, but only the current ones matter. Once he is gone, the kids won't really know or equate to Lebron and their hero will be the next great player that is slightly better or worse then LebonerMaybe for the simple fan....but when looking at all time greats finals mvps will be very important, PPG, APG, RPG and PER
That will be the criteria
Rings being the last criteria....Otherwise you would have this guy Tom Heinsohn as an all time great top 5....i mean he won 8 championships
Is he in any of your top 5 greatest players?