tducey
Sports discussion
Going to be interesting to see what happens with Lebron. Got to think if the Cavs don't win the title he's going to be exploring all his options.
lol...i mean you have to be joking now
at one point Shaq was gone- and Kobe was almost a Chicago Bull--- if not for Pau Gasol falling into your lap 5 years later- it would have been an unmitigated disaster- a HUGE embarrassment.
Maybe you think running one hall of famer out of town- and getting to the point where the other hall of famer is demanding a trade was good business.....lol
Lebron just said he would take a pay cut to play one or two season with Melo, CP3 and Wade. I can't wait until this happens to see what kind of clusterfuck that ends up to be.
That clusterfuck could start forming in Los Angeles this summer if they wanted to.
I would be soooooo happy if this happens in LA. So happy.
That clusterfuck could start forming in Los Angeles this summer if they wanted to.
You have one of the biggest iso players in the world in Melo. You have two guys who need the ball in their hands to be effective (CP3 and Lebron) and Wade is a terrible outside shooter. How in the world would those guys mesh?
1) You would have to get Lebron and Wade to take significant pay cuts.
2) You would have to assume Wade would want to leave the Heat, which he has never given an indication he would.
3) You would have to trade for Melo, who's on a huge contract. In order to get him you'd have to give up one of Russell or Randle.
4) CP3 isn't going anywhere unless he's a free agent, which he's not till 2018. The Clips won't trade him.
There's just no plausible way this happens, even if you wanted it to.
You have one of the biggest iso players in the world in Melo. You have two guys who need the ball in their hands to be effective (CP3 and Lebron) and Wade is a terrible outside shooter. How in the world would those guys mesh?
1) You would have to get Lebron and Wade to take significant pay cuts.
2) You would have to assume Wade would want to leave the Heat, which he has never given an indication he would.
3) You would have to trade for Melo, who's on a huge contract. In order to get him you'd have to give up one of Russell or Randle.
4) CP3 isn't going anywhere unless he's a free agent, which he's not till 2018. The Clips won't trade him.
There's just no plausible way this happens, even if you wanted it to.
so your gonna mock the Cavs for getting lucky in the lotto----- after the Lakers trade Shaq- make kobe angry enough to demand a trade- and then have Pau fall in their lap 4 YEARS after getting rid of Shaq....and in between waste MANY of Kobe's best years...great plan.Here's where everything falls apart for you. The Lakers didn't trade Kobe, they did make a trade for Pau Gasol and they returned to the finals 3 more times and won 2 more titles.
So yes, running one hall of famer out of town and having another demand a trade has worked out just fine for the Lakers.
It seems math isn't your strong suit either. Shaq left after the 2003-04 season and Pau arrived in the 2007-08 season, so it was a little over 3 years, not 5.
Also, the Lakers traded for Pau Gasol, that hardly constitutes "falling into their lap."
How many championships has running the organization so poorly that a hall of famer dumped your franchise on national tv, left to win 2 championships with another team and then return to your team resulted in?
Additionally, Kobe made his trade demand in the 2007-08 off-season. Then, when the season started, he saw how much Bynum had improved and there was no more trade talk even before they made the Gasol trade.
so your gonna mock the Cavs for getting lucky in the lotto----- after the Lakers trade Shaq- make kobe angry enough to demand a trade- and then have Pau fall in their lap 4 YEARS after getting rid of Shaq....and in between waste MANY of Kobe's best years...great plan.
riiiiiiiiiiight..hypocrite much?
Lakers trade Shaq after '03-'04 season
'04/05 Lakers miss the playoffs
'05/'06 Lakers get the 7 seed
'06/'07 Lakers get the 7 seed
Kobe starts freaking because the Lakers have done NOTHING and acquired NO ONE since the trading of Shaq- is almost traded to the Bulls- except Kobe doesnt want Deng going to LA in the deal because it means the team will be stripping itself clean and he will have no one to play with- so the deal is not done.
February of '08 the Lakers are gifted Pau from the Grizz- Kobe stops freaking out because the Lakers have actually made a good move after wasting 3 years of his prime with Smush Parker.
tell me which part is wrong?
i just think its funny that you try and discredit gilberts rebuilding when he gets high picks in the lotto- which was always what they were trying to do- when your team traded Shaq with no plan to replace him and wasted 3 years of Kobe's prime until you finally made a decent move- a move that was widely panned as cheap and less than fair by many- including Popovich.And yet, despite all of that, the Lakers managed to win 2 more titles. Remind us again how many the Cavs have.
Additionally, the Lakers weren't "gifted" anything. Memphis got the rights to Marc Gasol. Pretty sure they're happy with how things turned out.
I'm pretty sure that 5 titles hardly says Kobe's "prime" was wasted. Now, if he had ZERO titles then your claim might make more sense.so your gonna mock the Cavs for getting lucky in the lotto----- after the Lakers trade Shaq- make kobe angry enough to demand a trade- and then have Pau fall in their lap 4 YEARS after getting rid of Shaq....and in between waste MANY of Kobe's best years...great plan.
riiiiiiiiiiight..hypocrite much?
Lakers trade Shaq after '03-'04 season
'04/05 Lakers miss the playoffs
'05/'06 Lakers get the 7 seed
'06/'07 Lakers get the 7 seed
Kobe starts freaking because the Lakers have done NOTHING and acquired NO ONE since the trading of Shaq- is almost traded to the Bulls- except Kobe doesnt want Deng going to LA in the deal because it means the team will be stripping itself clean and he will have no one to play with- so the deal is not done.
February of '08 the Lakers are gifted Pau from the Grizz- Kobe stops freaking out because the Lakers have actually made a good move after wasting 3 years of his prime with Smush Parker.
tell me which part is wrong?
i just think its funny that you try and discredit gilberts rebuilding when he gets high picks in the lotto- which was always what they were trying to do- when your team traded Shaq with no plan to replace him and wasted 3 years of Kobe's prime until you finally made a decent move- a move that was widely panned as cheap and less than fair by many- including Popovich.
and you wonder why Cuban and Gilbert and the rest made sure CP stayed out of Purple and Gold and sent the Lakers into the death spiral they are still occupy to this day.
i didnt say it was bad for business--- i said it was RIDICULOUS and stupid to try and discredit Gilbert for "getting lucky" in the lotto- when their whole strategy was to acquire as many picks as possible (often times by renting out their cap room)- to rebuild the team quickly------ when the Lakers dealt Shaq with no viable alternative- and wasted 3 of Kobe's best years- until they made a trade that Popovich himself and many others- thought was a travesty where Jerry West just hooked up the Lakers--- to me that sounds like out and out- they crapped all over themselves but got bailed out in the end by a former laker.Tell me how this was bad for business? Been waiting on your answer. 2 more chips. A shit ton of profits. A huge TV deal. One of the highest valued sports franchises in the world. Wow, what a horrible business decision. You would have traded Kobe? One of them had to go.