The move isn't bad, but it's also not a great move. Hibbert is not going to get you any more than 7-8 rebounds a game while blocking about 2 shots a game & changing many other shots. Offensively, he is not effective as a go-to scoring option. He barely averages 10-11 points a game while shooting a dreadful % for a big man.
And when he plays against running teams, he will be run off the court & become a non-factor.
As a single year stop gap, this is an okay trade. But my question is: How is adding Hibbert any different than the addition of Boozler & Lin? They were all on 1 year deals.
Honestly, it's more like Lin than Boozer. Boozer was basically a veteran roster filler who could hopefully be a bit of a mentor for Randle. Unfortunately, Randle suffered a career ending injury so that didn't happen.
Lin was brought in with the hope that he could be consistently solid. The Lakers weren't looking for him to be "Linsanity" again. He was only 26 and on an expiring contract, so it was up to him to earn another one. The idea was that he would backup and learn from Nash and possibly be re-signed for less money going forward. Nash got hurt again and Lin never developed any consistency.
Hibbert is a 2 time all-star, is also 26 and on an expiring contract. Same deal, if all he needed was a location change and he plays well, it's win for the Lakers and he can be re-signed. If he doesn't respond, he's gone after the season and the Lakers lose nothing. Meanwhile, they are developing their young core to hopefully attract some FA's in the future.