I agree with @tlance that if it came down to a choice between giving up Kyrie or Horford... Boston would be much better off giving up Kyrie.Which is precisely why Kyrie is the player you deal.
As you said, he is far more valuable and also more easily replaced. Win/win for the Celtics.
Damn, you gonna shove Pau's corpse down their throat too?
Only with the Lakers is it news that the Spurs actually answered the phone.
Lakers probably borrowed one of Colangelo's burners.
These rumors are crazy and silly,
Something saying Trading for Kawhi now almost seals Lebron for the Lakers.
If you're the Spurs, why would you ever trade Kawhi to the Lakers before late July/early August knowing that info?
These rumors are crazy and silly,
Something saying Trading for Kawhi now almost seals Lebron for the Lakers.
If you're the Spurs, why would you ever trade Kawhi to the Lakers before late July/early August knowing that info?
I wonder what Boston and Philly offered
They want assets before the season and no drama. The Lakers have those assets
Boston offered a guy with a busted knee and a bag of chips
The Spurs have the Lakers in a high leverage situation this week. Once the new season starts next week, that dissipates considerably. If they can make the Lakers give away the house this week then they do the deal. But I really don't even know what that looks like.
And they can kick rocks for all thatThe deal could be a lot for Kawhi but it’s good the Spurs want more than the PG13 and Kyrie trade.
Mo Wagner, Kuzma, Ingram, Hart, a combination of 1st’s, a sign-and-trade for Randle and for them to take a contract off their books (probably would need a 3rd team)
I would offer Jaylen Brown, Marcus Morris, and the kings 2019 1st round pick
And they can kick rocks for all that
And they can kick rocks for all that
I would think the Lakers offered more. I heard some rumors that they offered that plus Rozier and another 1st