Jets Trade Up to 3rd Overall Pick

[wood20ks]

They're going in the top 3 for different reasons including scarcity, not because they're all the same quality; particularly, at least in my opinion, Darnold and potentially Allen.

You could put those 3 names in a bag and pull one out and to me Cleveland would still be a winner........All 3 qbs are still good choices imho.............plus they still get a future star at rb.........

But anyways,this is gonna be fun to watch on draft day.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

So its Barkley or go to #12? Thats a huge drop.

I'd say Barkley's floor is probably the Bucs

 

[Fountain City Blues]

You could put those 3 names in a bag and pull one out and to me Cleveland would still be a winner........All 3 qbs are still good choices imho.............plus they still get a future star at rb.........

But anyways,this is gonna be fun to watch on draft day.

I think we disagree about how many good QB's there are in this class.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

So its Barkley or go to #12? Thats a huge drop.

Unless its Barkley, and a QB they like as a backup plan, its hard to gauge, Giants are sending out a lotta smoke screens now, the whole "Eli has another 3 good years" which all of us know is bullshit

 

[deanpet21]

Only a fool drafts a RB in the top 5. Ask the Browns how that worked out with Trent Richardson.

lol. Richardson wasn't as talented as Barkley. So you don't like the Elliot and Fournette picks?

 

[Ojb81]

Somebody call the paramedics, we got another seizure on our hands.

a'hyuck, a'hyuck!

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

I think we disagree about how many good QB's there are in this class.

Id be shocked if the Browns passed on him at #4

Not so shocked if they dont take him first, but I could never see them pass on his twice

 

[deanpet21]

Unless its Barkley, and a QB they like as a backup plan, its hard to gauge, Giants are sending out a lotta smoke screens now, the whole "Eli has another 3 good years" which all of us know is bullshit

I agree. I take a QB if I was the Giants.

 

[flyerhawk]

I have to think that the Jets would be content with at least 2 of the available QBs.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

lol. Richardson wasn't as talented as Barkley. So you don't like the Elliot and Fournette picks?

I hate them both with a passion and laugh at them constantly for it. Fournette is a low-key terrible pick when Watson and Mahomes were still available. Ramsey is vastly more valuable as an elite CB than Elliott is as an elite RB who is already paid to be very good as a rookie.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Id be shocked if the Browns passed on him at #4

Not so shocked if they dont take him first, but I could never see them pass on his twice

Looking at the amount of picks they could get for #4 and how deep this RB class is anyways. It'd be hard to pass up. Chubb and Landry are guys I'd think twice about before trading down, however.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

I have to think that the Jets would be content with at least 2 of the available QBs.

I think its Allen and Mayfield

 

[deanpet21]

I hate them both with a passion and laugh at them constantly for it. Fournette is a low-key terrible pick when Watson and Mahomes were still available. Ramsey is vastly more valuable as an elite CB than Elliott is as an elite RB who is already paid to be very good as a rookie.

I agreed with Dallas b/c they have the oline to make Elliot great. Fourentte I am with you but he surprised me this year.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

I have been a Browns fans since before the last time they won the championship. They have been mediocre at QB since Kosar was released. I have watched them avoid taking a QB high in the draft every year since 2000. It is time to pick one that will work.

Who said Darnold? I much prefer him to Allen or Mayfield, but want Rosen.

Allbright, and other insiders seem to believe and/or are reporting it's Darnold for quite some time now.

 

[cwerph]

Allbright, and other insiders seem to believe and/or are reporting it's Darnold for quite some time now.

Sorry, thought you were quoting me.

Darnold is ok, but I prefer Rosen.

I do not want Barkley. Not at 1, not at 4. Hyde + Guice + Johnson is fine in the backfield.

Give me Rosen and Chubb and call it a winning first round for the Browns.

 

[DefCONNOne]

"but, but, but the Browns MUST take a quarterback #1! They must! My board ego depends on it!"

-moose

Well if it makes you feel any better, I think taking Barkley at #1 is the Brownsiest Browns thing the Browns could do. I also think Rosen is ripe for more concussions, so if that's who the Jets want at 3, I say have at it Jets.

 

[deanpet21]

Sorry, thought you were quoting me.

Darnold is ok, but I prefer Rosen.

I do not want Barkley. Not at 1, not at 4. Hyde + Guice + Johnson is fine in the backfield.

Give me Rosen and Chubb and call it a winning first round for the Browns.

I see your point. By getting Hyde you guys don't need Guice.

 

[Shanemansj13]

That’s a shitload to move up 3 spots and the QB you pick could still be average lol

 

[DefCONNOne]

what?
the browns are taking the RB at one..

Sure they are sport. Sure they are.

Are you in their draft meetings to know this is absolutely, for sure, stone cold lock, they're doing this?

 

[DefCONNOne]

Darnold at 1 is laughable.
Measurable are fine but did you watch this guy actually play. Where to distribute the football is rather important and this guy is an idiot when it comes to that. I don't know, maybe the browns will, but it will be a major mistake to pass on the RB at one and take a QB at 4

Barkley at one is even more laughable. Yet you're here banging that drum. I'd ask why but I see who you root for and already know the answer.