• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Is Clemson hurting themselves in the long run by playing two QBs?

tnapucco

Fair as fuck
18,016
3,115
293
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
The present
Hoopla Cash
$ 17,999.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
LOL

Internet badassery combined with third grade namecalling. Wow!
1290603068_crazy-brazilian-murderer-interview.gif
 

4down20

Quit checking me out.
56,133
8,402
533
Joined
May 10, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 394.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Never been a fan of 2 QB system. I like the old, "if you have 2 QB's, you don't have a QB".

I'm not a fan of that either, but I don't think this is a case of that. I don't think what's going on at Alabama is a case of that either.

We had that whole Zow/Watts deal and it was fucking awful. But what was different about that and what they do now is those 2 mostly played based on situation, and what they wanted to do. Neither had the full set of skills, we literally had no QB. I was more of a Zow guy, not a big fan of running QB's in general.

I think in this case it's more about just playing time and such, because they aren't coming in for different situations etc.
 
Top