- Thread starter
- #1
lionstop1
Top Notch
IRory aving a hard time buying into this one guys. I think it's very similar to how they've always tried to settle the problem with the #2 WR position. Tate is a decent player, but not what I think it will take to force teams to play the Lions differently. 31 million is a lot for this guy IMO. Assuming there was a chance, I would've perfered Ward or Verner. I think there's a few other guys I would've liked a bit better.
Even though I think a WR is still in play for the Lions, I have to ask how much better can Tate be than a 1st or 2nd or even a 3rd rd WR in this draft? Part of me feels like they wasted some cash on this one or maybe they plan on loading up on WRs.
I'm not concerned about Stafford over-throwing Tate as much as I am him being very average. Some other FA WR or rookie will come in and play great for a team and Tate will put up Nate-type numbers. I can see it now.
(Sorry Micro) lol
Even though I think a WR is still in play for the Lions, I have to ask how much better can Tate be than a 1st or 2nd or even a 3rd rd WR in this draft? Part of me feels like they wasted some cash on this one or maybe they plan on loading up on WRs.
I'm not concerned about Stafford over-throwing Tate as much as I am him being very average. Some other FA WR or rookie will come in and play great for a team and Tate will put up Nate-type numbers. I can see it now.
(Sorry Micro) lol