fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
I just think that you’re comparing two different games with different sets of rules when you invoke a fund manager. The fund situation is much more volatile. The cap situation is far more steady and predictable in its growth. The ultimate goal is to field a competitive team by keeping effective players that are still in the fold under contract while also having the flexibility to use FA to plug holes. In that regard, Roseman does a great job. My biggest issue with him (and maybe it’s his whole office) has been his evaluation of players being spotty. That’s seen in the draft record as well as some of the FA signings.The thing is, as we mostly know now, you likely are correct about the cap jump and cleaning up the mess, but he started this before that. I guess he obviously knew the dates of the agreements and assumed there would be a big bump. But the degree to which he has done this is the issue. I only looked at few guys. I'm sure there are others. Most importantly, IMO, you don't take the chance of a what if scenario. What if it doesn't increase significantly for some reason? I don't want to get into Covid talk here, but that derailed a season's cap. Who knows what the next thing could be. I just think you want your GM handling your cap like a seasoned fund manager who takes risks, but not like some of these coked up millennials throwing darts at a dart board.