HuskerCradle2Grave
Big Red in the Big Ten!
When you lose your 4th leading rebounder and 3rd leading scorer, it might make a bit of a difference.Just the only one that mattered
When you lose your 4th leading rebounder and 3rd leading scorer, it might make a bit of a difference.Just the only one that mattered
So.... you just went to an already established company to work like a pussy then?
So.... you just went to an already established company to work like a pussy then?
When you lose your 4th leading rebounder and 3rd leading scorer, it might make a bit of a difference.
So you know what he said. Yet you responded to my post by bringing up the 86 Bulls and then the Cavs championship roster?
But you're sensing that it's me who wants to argue?
LBJ only shitted on the entire Cavs fans base with his "decision". LOLMaybe.
But, if that's the case, why was he scared to talk to Russ? Why did he hide in his bed for 2 days afterwards?
That's not the actions of a " grown man ".
Still, nothing that came after changes the fact that Durant is either a liar about their closeness or a coward for not being able to be honest.
Say what you want about Lebron. But, he never did his "brothers " like that.
What Perkins didn't appreciate about Durant's decision, though, is how Durant did not tell Westbrook face to face that he was leaving. Westbrook said he heard the news like everyone else and received only a text message from Durant saying goodbye as he moved on to the Warriors.
"You a man," Perkins said. "You decide, the decision you want to make. But at the end of the day, it's about how you go about it. You don't send Russ a text and say, 'Hey, I'm going to the Warriors.' No. You do it like LeBron James did when he left Miami. He went down, and he sat and had dinner with Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade to tell them that he was leaving. That he was going to sign with Cleveland. That's what you do. That's what you do.
"That carries a long way. It don't take you nothing to call Nick Collison and Russell Westbrook and go and sit down and have a conversation with them and say, 'Hey guys, look. It's been fun. I still love y'all like my brothers, but I'm going to Golden State.' "
You said MJ's Bulls. I asked about the 86 team and you said you were referring to the championship teams and I said, never mind. You still felt the need to take a shot at me.
To start, at what point could we say that Pippen was considered a hall of famer? Certainly, he was on the 2nd run, but he didn't start his first all star game until 92. I guess you could consider him as a rising star, but not quite yet a legendary hall of famer in that first run. As for the teams they faced, they didn't quite have a definitely stronger number 2 option than Scottie, but they definitely had former all-stars at the 2, with arguably a deeper team from top to bottom(outside of the Lakers whom ran into injuries)The early Bulls teams didn't face great competition either. Two hall of famers can carry you a long way at that time.
That Bulls team had 2 Hall of Famers that were on the all time 50. What other teams in the league could say that at the time? The Celtics had a geriatric team by that time. The Pistons were still good but getting older.
The early Bulls championships were during a time of transition in the league. The big bad teams of the 80s were fading away and the new challengers were quite ready to challenge(ie Pacers, Rockets. 3 teams won titles in the 90s. 4 teams won titles over a 13 year span.
Hes' all over the place, I dont even understand the point he is trying to make
I think he's on an ether binge. Guy makes no sense.
He was accusing me of not having any proof that @SJ76 works at the El Sobrante Shell Station...
Tards gonna tard, you know?
I think he's on an ether binge. Guy makes no sense.
He was accusing me of not having any proof that @SJ76 works at the El Sobrante Shell Station...
Tards gonna tard, you know?
That was between Shaq & the FO
Who is denying they didn't get along that well?There is a whole Wiki page (multiple pages, over 150 references) devoted to the Shaq-Kobe feud.
Shaq–Kobe feud
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shaquille O'Neal (left) and Kobe Bryant (right) helped the Lakers win three straight NBA titles. Though they played well together on the court, the pair had an acrimonious relationship at times in the locker room.[1]
The "Shaq–Kobe feud" (or "Kobe–Shaq feud") was the conflict between National Basketball Association (NBA) players Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe Bryant, who played together on the Los Angeles Lakers team from 1996 to 2004.
When you lose your 4th leading rebounder and 3rd leading scorer, it might make a bit of a difference.
Sheesh, calm down, I wasn't comparing anything, and if I were to compare such a subject, it would be about those Bulls teams to Lebron's title teams(or the Heat)Pippen and Grant were much better than anyone Lebron ever had during his first 7 years in Cleveland. Lebron was basically told as an 18-24 year old that he was to take the entire team of absolute nobodies on his shoulders and win titles. Hell, MJ was a few months shy of 22 before he ever even stepped foot onto an NBA floor.
Pippen is one of the best players of all-time, especially defensively, while Horace Grant averaged almost a double-double for their first 3-peat. The best player Lebron had for 7 years (SEVEN YEARS) was a volume scorer in Antawn Jamison who was already in his mid-30s when he first played in Cleveland. Anyone who tried comparing Lebron's original supporting cast in Cleveland to Jordan's during either 3-peat is insanely stupid and clearly knows nothing about Lebron before he went to Miami.
Product management in the chemical industry, brah. And of course, Bron nuts.What do you do? Besides love on dem Bron nuts and hate?
Just looked at the rosters that the '07 Cavs went through on the way to the finals. LOL! None of those teams would have made the NCAA Final Four that year. LOL!