Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
It also says he wasn't any longer when he went down. Or did you purposely miss that part?
Hold on, he's checking Philly papers.
It also says he wasn't any longer when he went down. Or did you purposely miss that part?
So Wentz needs help?
Seriously, now that McNabb took a shot, never. Philly fans hate McNabb, so much.
Lane Johnson fires back at McNabb's comments
Eagles running game last year was a shell of what it was in 2017. I'll put some of the blame on Wentz, but not all of it.
Hold on, he's checking Philly papers.
Nice article it says “Carson Wentz was on the top of our list since mid season”
Haha. Liar. It says Brady and he were close but then BEFORE wentz got hurt he wasn’t on top... in fact, he wasn’t even close.
You got exposed again dipshit and now you’re lying, taking quotes out of context, etc... in other words, your usual game.
It also says he wasn't any longer when he went down. Or did you purposely miss that part?
Haha. Liar. It says Brady and he were close but then BEFORE wentz got hurt he wasn’t on top... in fact, he wasn’t even close.
You got exposed again dipshit and now you’re lying, taking quotes out of context, etc... in other words, your usual game.
And who was at top when Wentz got hurt.
stop the world, I want to get off ~PE1~We must be reading different articles. I’m reading Mansters that said Wentz was on top the entire time until that week.
Didn’t seem to bother Foles.
Haha. Liar. It says Brady and he were close but then BEFORE wentz got hurt he wasn’t on top... in fact, he wasn’t even close.
You got exposed again dipshit and now you’re lying, taking quotes out of context, etc... in other words, your usual game.
We must be reading different articles. I’m reading Mansters that said Wentz was on top the entire time until that week.
Can you show me where it says Wentz wasn’t close cause I don’t see that anywhere I Mansters article
He got hurt the game after the article. How does that not equal Wentz was not first before injury?He got hurt the next week so the article doesn’t say but to beat a top team on the road while throwing 4 TDs in 3 quarters and Brady having one I guess Wentz.
Again, you take the sentence and cut it off to suit your narrative. For YEARS you’ve said Wentz was a lock for the MVP before his injury. This article states that 1) he wasn’t even leading the race the week going into his injury and 2) his lead over Brady was only a SLIGHT lead. Here is the FULL sentence you cite from that article:
It has been Carson Wentz at the top of our poll since we started it at midseason, but Tom Brady has been right behind him the whole time.
You misrepresented yet again.
The chart shows Brady with 8 first place votes and only 2 for Wentz and a Wilson. Brady has a lead of 4X as many first place votes. That’s not close.
He got hurt the game after the article. How does that not equal Wentz was not first before injury?
You do know how calendars work don't you?