CatsTopPac
Well-Known Member
Where were are now is that playing at home (to him) are as quality of a win, as other teams (mainly AZ) beating evenly (or better) ranked teams on the road. His basis flip flops between "they aren't playing like they did before" (which gives to and takes power from teams depending on what helps his argument), and but SU's homecourt is as good of a homecourt to give them such an advantage).
It's interesting though (and I think you covered it): most all of the games that they get such a great turnout for, are against tough teams, and they win. This is the biggest help of an homecourt advantage. But it's when they beat up on sorry teams that not as many people come out for, and those are his basis for arguing against having the turnout to support the advantage. What a fucking backward ass argument!!!
It's interesting though (and I think you covered it): most all of the games that they get such a great turnout for, are against tough teams, and they win. This is the biggest help of an homecourt advantage. But it's when they beat up on sorry teams that not as many people come out for, and those are his basis for arguing against having the turnout to support the advantage. What a fucking backward ass argument!!!