- Thread starter
- #6,521
I'm only 3 episodes in, but I agree. So much better and they are doin a great job of recapturing the Dexter vibes.Yup.
Looks like the writing is a bit sharper.
I'm only 3 episodes in, but I agree. So much better and they are doin a great job of recapturing the Dexter vibes.Yup.
Looks like the writing is a bit sharper.
Anybody watch this?
Not usually a fan of anything with Keira Knightley... I typically avoid her at all costs lolIt's a weird one, pretty dark. Worth watching, not great but interesting.
Well, there is this........Not usually a fan of anything with Keira Knightley... I typically avoid her at all costs lol
Wait… YT allows nudity?Well, there is this........
(From The Hole, which is a horror movie).
Wait… YT allows nudity?
That is a pretty cool cast right there.So I said that I was done with my current run of watching older horror movies. I guess that was a lie!
At least there are a couple of decent ones in recently.
House of Wax (1953)-
......as the rather poor trailer overly emphasizes, this one is noted for being the first color 3D movie.
Anyways, Vincent Price stars as a wax sculptor whose work is destroyed by his money hungry partner for the insurance. Vincent survives the blaze but his work is all destroyed and he is unable to work now being wheel chair bound and his hands burnt. Yet, he still manages to create more wax figures. At the same time an unkown assailant is killing people and their bodies are disappearing from the morgue.
In addition to Vincent chewing up scenery, a young Charles Bronson plays his muscular deaf-mute assistant (I guess they didn't want him talking?), and it was the first major role for Carolyn Jones (Mortica Adams).
This one is considered a classic, despite initial mixed reviews. It holds a 95% on Rotton Tomatoes. But I think that is a bit strong. It is truely creepy, but it drags a bit and the performances are a bit hit and miss. It panders a bit too much to the 3D gimmick, for example wasting several minutes showing a guy putting on a yo-yo show. But Price is great!
I'll go 7 to 7.5 outta 10 range. That is with an extra point added solely for Vincent Price.
I'm both interested and concerned to see what they do with this one.
This made me LOL for real.
Loved it. For the Night Stalker movie, I'll give it a 10.The Night Stalker (1972)-
A killer roams the Las Vegas nightlife murdering young ladies and draining them of their blood. Kolchak, a grizzled beat reporter argues with his boss and the police who refuse to believe the vampire angle. The police suspect it is a very prolific serial killer and Kolchak strikes a deal to help investigate.
I remember watching an episode or 2 of the later tv series Kolchak: The Night Stalker when I was a kid, but I don't think I ever saw the movie.
This one was a fun watch. McGavin does a great job as Kolchak. The killer has a couple of big brawls in which they do an excellent job, considering the times and budget, making him look strong and invunerable. The police and news chief are written great as unintentional foils to Kolchak as they contantly yell at him.
There was this stunt mishap that they left in the movie that freaked me out. Note the guy who runs in and just drags the unconscious stuntman off screen as shit just keeps on going! I couldn't find anything else on it so I guess he survived?
So I already knew that Chris Carter considers this movie as the inspiration for my all-time fav The X-Files, but I didn't know it was screenplayed by the legendary Richard Matheson (I Am Legend, Hell House, A Stir of Echoes, a bunch of Twilight Zone episodes, etc). It was the highest rated tv show ever at the time and was released theatrically in Europe, and while I was aware of the tv series (which I now want to go watch) but there was also a sequel, The Night Strangler that I also need to see.
A fine movie but keep in mind the budget limitations and when it was made. Acting is great. Fine storyline execution. The police and boss that keep fucking with Kolchak makes it even more interesting. The fxs are a bit weak and light from today's perspective.
I'll go 7.5 to 8 outta 10 range. Good stuff!
@Chef99 Have you seen the sequel, The Night Strangler?Loved it. For the Night Stalker movie, I'll give it a 10.
I was very disappointed in the tv series, although McGavin made it worth watching for awhile.
Are you saying "apparently" in that you read about it or just from that trailer? Because I think the trailer was just talking about the TCM impact, just saying that he was introduced in 1974 and in 2022 will be reintroduced... I didn't see any sort of technology in the trailer that would give me a clue it was modern-day or anything.I'm both interested and concerned to see what they do with this one.
Apparently it is a direct sequel to the original (good, as the sequels were largely trash) which puts Leatherface somewhere in his 70s (questionable to have someone my Dad's age sprinting around with a chainsaw slicing up kids).
But it has to be better than TCM: The Beginning, or Leatherface, doesn't it?? Those sucked!
Fingers crossed!
Yeah, I read about it. So not from the trailer.Are you saying "apparently" in that you read about it or just from that trailer? Because I think the trailer was just talking about the TCM impact, just saying that he was introduced in 1974 and in 2022 will be reintroduced... I didn't see any sort of technology in the trailer that would give me a clue it was modern-day or anything.
But yeah, the thought of a 70+-year-old chasing people with a chainsaw seems a bit much. Plus, there would be no grandpa anymore and he was a huge part of the creep factor in the original lol.