It took them years to recover from letting Steinbach goI think Zeitler is as good as gone unfortunately.
With the Eifert extension coming and amount of resources devoted to the OL the past couple drafts, I could see them letting him walk like they did Steinbach back in the day.
The moment we resigned Boling and Whit this was a done deal IMO.
It took them years to recover from letting Steinbach go
Not only that, but people seem to forget, that you simply have to have 3-4 solid CB's to compete on defense in today's NFL. So many 3-4 Wide sets with teams spreading it out. Sure you could mix/match coverage and zone schemes, but having guys that can play man allows the rest of the defense to place more pressure on the QB.It came out today that Kirkpatrick had shoulder surgery this offseason. That's two corners with bum shoulders and one guy on the wrong side of 30. It further validates the decision to take a corner in the first round - Corner IS a need on this team.
It came out today that Kirkpatrick had shoulder surgery this offseason. That's two corners with bum shoulders and one guy on the wrong side of 30. It further validates the decision to take a corner in the first round - Corner IS a need on this team.
About Vigil, a lot of people saying he could have been had later, but when you have 3 guys on the staff that know LB's (Lewis, Guenther, and Haslett), all saying he was the right pick there, it's hard to argue. He may not have the kind of ability to be a stud, but his speed and awareness should lend him to being a very productive coverage LB. Something that the Bengals have lacked for several years, and hope to get out of Dansby this year obviously with Vigil potentially working with him to be ready for a bigger role in 2017.
He struggled with injuries. Not saying he would have been great if not for that, but his one full solid year, he did have 90 tackles. Not bad. But was twice injured, (once early in his career, and again at the end) and screwed his back up effectively ending his playing days I believe.I hope he's good.... I just keep thinking of Marvin's early linebacker picks (guys like Caleb Miller) and hoping that we're not going down that road again.
Where did I ever say Marvin was in charge of player personnel, where draft picks fall under that umbrella, which is the topic (you wanted to say that blaming Mike Brown for everything is getting old when the only thing discussed was the movement up or down in a draft in order to target a player. Mike makes these decisions. Marvin has nothing to do with it. Tobin creates the draft board. Marvin can give input about the value he sees in a player, and he and Tobin can discuss it, and maybe Lewis changes Tobin's opinion. But, Tobin finalizes the board and assesses the final value on the players. Mike makes the picks, listening to those willing to speak up, but in the end he goes basically with Tobin's recommendation. It's a collective process, but Mike makes the pick generally off of Tobin's evaluations. It's just not about the best talent. There are a lot of factors and Mike weighs them all. Every year for the last dozen years, he's tried to delegate more to others, weigh other people's opinions more heavily, and done something different that he hadn't tried before. It's been a remarkable turnaround from his stubborn ways of doing things before,...a very long time ago. And, I've heaped praise upon him with every positive move along the way, defending him by pointing out that he isn't what he was before. Even during his terrible days as an owner, I acknowledged that he was the most respected businessman in the Tri-County area because he was careful, cautious, and trustworthy with your investment if you chose to place him in charge of your money. Most of the top businessmen in the Tri-County area did just that. We are talking about a very intelligent individual. It seems, as the franchise multiplied by a 20-25% value every year under his watch, he felt comfortable enough when it reached a certain grandiose level, that the family's numerous other assets and businesses, along with the pure value of the franchise, afforded him the opportunity to begin taking risks...baby steps every year, but risks. If he tried something and it didn't work, he didn't do it again. He's a great businessman. But, he tried something else. He's been trying to replace Rich Braham for 10 years. It just hasn't worked out. He went so far as to go away from a fundamental belief or inability to carry out and make a draft day move of picks. He hasn't done it since as he's waiting for the results. He doesn't like giving away pick(s) to target a player. In the case of the first round, he had value at CB (or DE) waiting for him if his WR wasn't there. He would have had to give up his 4th or 5th Rd pick to move up 3 spots and there goes a potential Starter at NT or C who will be affordable for the next 3-4 years.Brown deserves a lot of fault for how things went from 1991ish into the 2000's, and even through 2010, as he kept meddling, but since 2010, it's pretty much been Marvin Lewis' show, along with Katie and Duke.
All I was saying is that the narrative of blaming Mike Brown for everything is tired, lazy, and outdated.
If, as you say, Duke/Marvin are in charge, then why are you STILL blaming teams for not trading with the Bengals on Mike? Surely most other teams GM's know that Tobin is the defacto GM. Hell, a few teams made a run at Tobin this past off-season, so he's no secret to the NFL. Teams know who they are dealing with now. So, why do you then continue to use a narrative that is outdated?
Again, you make no sense. None.
I can't even make sense of the first paragraph (if you can call it that, it all runs together, and is basically conjecture of an opinion, not fact).What in the hell are you talking about? First, everything you say in the first paragraph is straight out of your own mental model of how the Bengals work. There is nothing in there that either you, I, or anyone else could confirm even if we want to.... Now, to my real questions....
1) What other businesses do the Brown family run?
2) Paul Allen is a terrible businessman? Every business of his failed? Have you ever heard of a little business named Microsoft? Do you realize that Paul Allen is one of the top 50 richest dudes in the world?
We'll see a double FB set, with Peko and the new DT, with Vigil in at RB on goal line plays!Vigil plays running back as well as Linebacker.
lol.
Bengals love shit like that.
First off, it should be common knowledge to anyone living in the Tri-County area who it's business leaders are, unless they are OK with being an uninformed voter. This should not be news to you. You need the education, so I'm going to make you do the research yourself. Their business interests have been widespread for a couple of decades. Mike Brown has been the most influential businessman among his peers for his business acumen for the last 15 years. His advice is the most respected around and the top businesspeople feel it's a privilege to have him Chair their boards. I shouldn't have to tell you from 2000 miles away about basic knowledge from your own back yard. Do some leg work.What in the hell are you talking about? First, everything you say in the first paragraph is straight out of your own mental model of how the Bengals work. There is nothing in there that either you, I, or anyone else could confirm even if we want to.... Now, to my real questions....
1) What other businesses do the Brown family run?
2) Paul Allen is a terrible businessman? Every business of his failed? Have you ever heard of a little business named Microsoft? Do you realize that Paul Allen is one of the top 50 richest dudes in the world?