Legally this Domestic violence case never happened
Hardy was convicted then appealed and the conviction overturned then it was expunged. In the eyes of the Justice system this never happened.
The Carolina DA alleged that Holder was paid a settlement to not cooperate but that has never been proven.
The NFL suspended him for 10 games appeal reduced it to 4 through arbitration and the suspension served.
All in all Hardy has served the punishment that has been handed down to him legally and from the NFL.
So exactly what has Hardy done ? He has been accused of beating his girlfriend , Pictures have been obtained by his employer and a punishment has been given per the terms of his employment in the NFL. Hardy has went through the Legal process in the State that the alleged crime was committed and has been found Legally innocent of anything.
The bold is a laughably incorrect statement of law. If the system decided "innocence," there would be millions more people in prison.
As for the underlined, I don't care why she isn't testifying. The important fact is that she isn't testifying. And why do you think that is? If Hardy were innocent, why wouldn't she say so in court again? (Hint: Because then she could be impeached with her prior statements and Hardy would be found guilty AGAIN.)
You also say this case has been adjudicated, but it hasn't. The case was dismissed by the court on appeal, which means that the trial never happened. The case was not dismissed with prejudice, per any reports I have seen. So jeopardy hasn't been triggered...the case has not been adjudicated.