AU_Fever
The secret of getting ahead is getting started.
A 6th rounder for Gabbert. What's the harm. Instead of drafting a QB as a backup, Niners could add depth to the DL.
I liked Gabbert coming out of college, but quickly changed my mind about him after the preseason. The guy gets rattled way too easily, but behind a good OL he could impress.
I think everyone is jumping the gun on this Gabbert trade... It's not like the Niners gave up a lot and there is no guarantee that they will keep him in the final roster... Trading for Gabbert does not automatically preclude the Niners drafting a QB.. It just gives them a safety net if none of the higher QB prospect is available by the time the Niners draft...
Gotta admit, I'm a little intrigued by this. Obviously it's a long shot that Gabbert actually does anything with the Niners, but he's got some similarities to Alex Smith, and Harbaugh was able to turn Smith around. And the Niners have had a great track record recently in terms of rehabilitating disappointing first round picks. For a 6th rounder, I think it's worth a shot.
I said it last year and in years past that if somebody can find me a realistic worse QB name to add to the team than Colt McCoy then go ahead and try but you probably can't do it. I said to friends when he was in college that I'd legally change my name to Colt McCoy (awful name) if he could become an average-above average quarterback at any point in his career.
I said when they traded for him that any of you probably couldn't name me a realistic quarterback I'd want LESS on the 49ers as a backup than Colt McCoy. He literally was at the bottom of my list. Last. Nobody behind him. I'd rather have McLeod Bethel-Thompson who was on the 49ers backing up Kaepernick than McCoy.
Gabbert is slightly above McCoy but not by much. It's not a shocking move to me, though. Harbaugh was on his believer list when he came out, according to reports. This feels more like a Harbaugh move than a predominately backed Baalke move with some kind of support from Harbaugh.
I'm not going to act like most fans and think that there's this long list of guys that were realistically available for the 49ers to pick from, but this is another one of a semi long list of depth players that I don't/didn't like.
On a childish, superficial level. Gabbert is EXTREMELY hard to look at physically, too. That doesn't help.
[/B]
LOL. He'll fit right in with kaepernick then who is a dead ringer for Squidward Tentacles from the Sponge Bob cartoon series.
What would Gabbert's incentive be? Just wondering. They traded a sixth round for him and I suppose they could just forget it and cut him, but why? It seems like he should keep the deal he has (2.01 for one year) over 1M for one year. Is it that he thinks by doing so he could get another year from it? I mean, 1 million is pretty low. A backup can make up to 4 Million a year (Moore, but he was competing for starter) (3.625 for Hasselbeck.)
True, but I think he is saying that trading that sixth rounder means they wouldn't draft a higher QB to develop that would have made the roster for cheaper. Develop and trade that higher picked prospect (for a good pick) versus develop but hope never to see the field (Gabbert)?