- Thread starter
- #81
Means nothing, what's the point?
LOL, you're a smart man. You know what it means. You might not like it but you understand.
Cousins is and has been great, but we must also realize that he is playing with two #1 wr’s
Cousins is and has been great, but we must also realize that he is playing with two #1 wr’s
Are they both 1s?
How about that OL and that run game?
Both are definitely #1 worthy. Yes the run game and OL are not good
I am not sure how a WR without a thousand yard campaign can be a 1. I just don’t see it. Before you say he would without Thielen, I believe the Rams and the Broncos have both had three, thousand yard receivers in the same season.
So why do we keep standings? Because if every team doesn't play every other team, then the circle is different. So comparing a team that plays the Cards, Browns, and Giants against a team that plays the Patriots, Chiefs and Rams means nothing? So lets just give everyone blue ribbons at the end of the year and call them all winners in their own circles.I do understand and that's the problem? What @ChrisRussell's point boils down to this example...ready?... You're @Sportster 72, I'm @Stymietee, we do things differently in the circle that we operate in. Comparing the two in terms of which of us is better in the other's circle means exactly what?
It’s not just my opinion. Others have said the same. One of them is in the “Cousins chose wisely” article I just posted. He’s not the only one I’ve heard it from either. They are clearly an awesome tandem
I do understand and that's the problem? What @ChrisRussell's point boils down to this example...ready?... You're @Sportster 72, I'm @Stymietee, we do things differently in the circle that we operate in. Comparing the two in terms of which of us is better in the other's circle means exactly what?