SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
if hes the Z receiver and not the yIf Goff can take a page out of Hoyer's playbook and force the ball to Watkins, Watkins could have his biggest season yet. Targets=fantasy production.
if hes the Z receiver and not the yIf Goff can take a page out of Hoyer's playbook and force the ball to Watkins, Watkins could have his biggest season yet. Targets=fantasy production.
Watkins is a redzone target? Let's find out the truth
2016, 8 games played, 4 targets inside the 20.
2015, 13 games played, 6 targets inside the 20
2014, 16 games played, 10 targets inside the 20
I think not
what did i tell you about logicBtw, each one of those years, there was at least one Bills skill position player who had more
Its ok here, he already ignores mewhat did i tell you about logic
Its ok here, he already ignores me
Watkins was a redzone target. He was not used for those other targets as much because of Taylor's playing style.
Watkins is a redzone target? Let's find out the truth
2016, 8 games played, 4 targets inside the 20.
2015, 13 games played, 6 targets inside the 20
2014, 16 games played, 10 targets inside the 20
I think not
He was on pace for four TDs. Lol.
I think volume of catches and yards are huge in fantasy. TDs are not something I focus on as much. Julio Jones...
Much harder to sustain big numbers there. If I think TDs up a receivers value, I try to trade them. A lot.
I second this too. Touches are the ultimate measure of value. No matter the potential, you can't score without the ball.
No, he isn't. But his scoring will most likely be much more consistent.Like I said, he wasnt remotely healthy at any point last year. What pace he was on while playing visibly hurt (in need of surgery) isnt really all that relevant to his talent IMO.
Volume of catches are fine. But a receiver with 80 catches for 1000 yards and 10 TDs isnt necessarily better than one with 50 catches for 1000 yards and 10 TDs.
First downs...Sort of. They measure the way a player is used too. Take Jarvis Landry vs DJax. Landry has had seasons with way more catches than DJax but has never touched DJax's levels of TDs and yards. And ultimately for a team - yards and TDs matter a lot more. Touches dont actually provide anything until they actually lead to yards or TDs.
No, he isn't. But his scoring will most likely be much more consistent.
TDs are a crap shoot at times. Consistent pass catchers and ball carriers win out for me over home run hitters.
It's regardless of PPR imo.Sure and if youre playing ppr this is a whole nother story, I just meant pure talent wise ignoring fantasy points
First downs...
53 -35 Landry in 2016
61-15 Landry in 2015
52-37 Landry in 2014.
More important than yards.
It's regardless of PPR imo.
(Standard scoring sucks. Crapshoot vulture TDs are given too much value.)
On that one drive, maybe.I do like first downs but I dont know about being more important than yards
If jackson catches a 50 yard TD on his drive and Landry converts three 3rd downs with 8 yard catches...DJax is providing a lot more value even though Landry has 3 times as many 1st downs.
On that one drive, maybe.
Landry is the superior player by a good margin. Jackson has averaged one more tD per season since Landry came into the league. Not nearly enough to outweigh the other areas.
what did i tell you about logic